re: BREAKING: Trump will sign executive order shortly about social media companies

From the linked article:

But rather than facilitate free speech, Silicon Valley now uses Section 230 to justify censorship, leading to a legal and policy muddle. For instance, in response to a lawsuit challenging its speech policies, Google claimed that restricting its right to censor would “impose liability on YouTube as a publisher.” In the same motion, Google argues that its right to restrict political content also derives from its “First Amendment protection for a publisher’s editorial judgments,” which “encompasses the choice of how to present, or even whether to present, particular content.”

So they want to be protected by not being a publisher, but also exercise their rights of free speech as a publisher? That’s not how it works.