- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wednesday Goes to Washington
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:35 pm to Diamondawg
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:35 pm to Diamondawg
Wednesday w/o the little dog in a gay purse and she is brunette.
I will be joining her
I will be joining her
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:38 pm to Wednesday
quote:
Wednesday
Start the go fund me page Bawette. “If Not Now. When” [IN]
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:44 pm to Wednesday
I have huge crushes on both Wednesday and Cajun.
Smart women are so sexy.
Smart women are so sexy.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 8:47 pm to Wednesday
What kind of help are you looking for?
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:00 pm to cajunangelle
You would be very surprised CA
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:03 pm to Wednesday
So how long does Judge Sullivan have to react to Sidney's filing?
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:08 pm to cajunangelle
Basically as long as Judge Sullivan wants. He made up the rules, and so I guess you can just make up the deadlines
Infuriating
Infuriating
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:28 pm to Wednesday
It would be great if you legal pros could send the judge a brief or whatever, calling bullshite on this order. You would be a TDPB hero.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:33 pm to Wednesday
I will contribute and will appear if a hearing is scheduled.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:21 pm to Wednesday
I'd focus on the precedent set by Judge Sullivan himself in the Ted Stevens case. Stevens was convicted but the case was dismissed prior to sentencing due to gross prosecutorial misconduct. The DOJ, then led by Eric Holder, filed a motion to dismiss, which was accepted without hesitation by Judge Sullivan.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:13 am to Wednesday
I had no idea amicus briefs were allowed at the district court level until it happened in the Stone case.
How common is it? Just for high-profile matters or can the maritime association file an amicus brief into my mundane Jones Act case?
How common is it? Just for high-profile matters or can the maritime association file an amicus brief into my mundane Jones Act case?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:15 am to Wednesday
I am not a lawyer and I have never played one on T.V..
I think this is all bullshite but I do have a question. Are the judges actions predicated on the fact that he already plead guilty and therefore no prosecution is required, only sentencing?
I think this is all bullshite but I do have a question. Are the judges actions predicated on the fact that he already plead guilty and therefore no prosecution is required, only sentencing?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:17 am to Animal
quote:
Are the judges actions predicated on the fact that he already plead guilty and therefore no prosecution is required, only sentencing?
It certainly complicated things. Flynn stood up in open court, under oath, and admitted to the factual predicate of the crime.
Now the judge is being asked to set that aside by the defense team and the government is now saying “hey, all this stuff we’ve said and done for 3 years, don’t worry about that” and dismiss the case outright.
My guess is Sullivan will allow the public to weigh in, chastise the DOJ publicly at a hearing, but eventually dismiss it as requested.
This post was edited on 5/13/20 at 8:18 am
Posted on 5/13/20 at 8:18 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
How common is it? Just for high-profile matters or can the maritime association file an amicus brief into my mundane Jones Act case?
Depends on if the judges personal politics leads him to wants things written into the public record I guess.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News