- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Questions about Longer-Term Storage (drives)
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:50 am to Pettifogger
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:50 am to Pettifogger
quote:Probably, but I wouldn't trust them. There are several things that can go wrong and either corrupt data or make them unreadable. First, data is stored in magnetic fields, which degrade over time. 10 years is probably not long enough to make any real difference, but I believe there is a decent chance that at least some files would be corrupted. Second is the fact that HDDs are mechanical, and like every machine they tend to seize up if not used for long periods. Lubricants dry up, parts stick to each other, etc.
Should those drives last in storage for 10 years or so
But if you fire them up every year or two and write new copies like you mentioned, you should be fine.
Honestly, though, archive management is a real pain, and you might want to look into cloud storage options. Amazon AWS has a "cold storage" option called Glacier for about $1 per TB/month. Also, Backblaze has an unlimited data storage plan for $60/year. I probably wouldn't trust a 3rd party service to be around forever, but it might give you some peace of mind vs. trying to manage all of the data locally. It doesn't matter how many copies you make, if they're all in the same physical location, one disaster can take them all out.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 11:57 am to Korkstand
quote:
It doesn't matter how many copies you make, if they're all in the same physical location, one disaster can take them all out.
good point. i should probably offload a copy of the DVD media to a family member's house or something.
Posted on 4/21/20 at 12:07 pm to Korkstand
Thanks to you both. I've always assumed it would be a PITA to use a cloud service for that much personal data, but I guess it's really not anymore. I just uploaded about 100gb to OneDrive and it didn't take as long as I thought.
So maybe HDD+cloud+possible optical copy would be a solid (if not enterprise-level/foolproof) way to go? Seems like 1 physical+1 cloud backup for my old photos is fairly decent, especially if I periodically upgrade my archive drives as time/tech advances.
For current year stuff I'll likely keep doing what I'm doing (SSD+HDD) and periodically do a cloud backup too, so there should be an extra redundant backup for that stuff.
Related (probably dumb) question - am I putting my plan at risk by having both of my "current" drives (SSD and HDD) connected to my desktop at all times? As in - what's the likelihood of a problem impairing both drives (and potentially wiping out main storage+backup)?
So maybe HDD+cloud+possible optical copy would be a solid (if not enterprise-level/foolproof) way to go? Seems like 1 physical+1 cloud backup for my old photos is fairly decent, especially if I periodically upgrade my archive drives as time/tech advances.
For current year stuff I'll likely keep doing what I'm doing (SSD+HDD) and periodically do a cloud backup too, so there should be an extra redundant backup for that stuff.
Related (probably dumb) question - am I putting my plan at risk by having both of my "current" drives (SSD and HDD) connected to my desktop at all times? As in - what's the likelihood of a problem impairing both drives (and potentially wiping out main storage+backup)?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News