- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
QUAD! Great turn around!
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 8:00 pm
Quad collapsed over the past 2 years. In fact, in the 3rd quarter, it dropped to below 4 from the 2018 $30 level.
I purchased at 4.36. It's bounced up to 5, and earnings came out tonight!
The est was .12, the actual .38, and the stock has jumped 28%. It's now up to 6.50 and will continue it's dividend of 12.3%
I hope for a dip and to take a larger position tomorrow.
I purchased at 4.36. It's bounced up to 5, and earnings came out tonight!
The est was .12, the actual .38, and the stock has jumped 28%. It's now up to 6.50 and will continue it's dividend of 12.3%
I hope for a dip and to take a larger position tomorrow.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:28 pm to Jjdoc
I’ve seen better stocks on the quad
Posted on 2/18/20 at 9:54 pm to Jjdoc
Negative free cash flow and 12% yield??!??
Have fun buddy
Have fun buddy
Posted on 2/18/20 at 10:13 pm to Jjdoc
I’m generally curious about this investment strategy. I see a stock that over the last year has dropped nearly 56% with a dividend payout that was recently cut in half ($0.30 per share per quarter to $0.15). And despite a huge beat bottom line and a beat on the top line, and a major improvement from the rest of year, I see a stock whose EPS has dropped from $0.53 a year earlier to $0.38 on revenue that has dropped from $1.17 to $1.07 billion.
Maybe I’m wrong with my approach, but if I’m looking at dividend stocks, I’m looking for both the relative short term (one year) and long term (5 year) history:
1. Price appreciation, or at the very least, the lack of depreciation.
2. Increasing dividend payout, or at the very least, a payout that doesn’t decrease.
3. If available, a positive future outlook, or at the best least, not a negative outlook from analysts.
And in regards to the first two points, this is why find dividend yields to be deceiving since they can be a result of poor performance (e.g., stock whose price has dropped significantly), and/or unsustainable (e.g., high payout ratios, sometimes exceeding 100%). As a result, I’ve rarely, if ever, found super high dividend yielding stocks (10% or higher) to be worthwhile as an investment for the future.
Maybe I’m wrong with my approach, but if I’m looking at dividend stocks, I’m looking for both the relative short term (one year) and long term (5 year) history:
1. Price appreciation, or at the very least, the lack of depreciation.
2. Increasing dividend payout, or at the very least, a payout that doesn’t decrease.
3. If available, a positive future outlook, or at the best least, not a negative outlook from analysts.
And in regards to the first two points, this is why find dividend yields to be deceiving since they can be a result of poor performance (e.g., stock whose price has dropped significantly), and/or unsustainable (e.g., high payout ratios, sometimes exceeding 100%). As a result, I’ve rarely, if ever, found super high dividend yielding stocks (10% or higher) to be worthwhile as an investment for the future.
Posted on 2/20/20 at 12:54 pm to Jjdoc
Forgot I was on the Money Board for a second...and expected a thread on improved babes in LSU’s quad.
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)