Started By
Message

re: Californians want LGBT Pedophiles exempt from the sex offender rolls

Posted on 2/18/20 at 4:24 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67790 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 4:24 pm to
Basically now the law differentiates between vaginal and anal/oral sex with teenagers 15 or older.

So currently, a judge can use discretion for a 19 year old and 17 year old having vaginal sex and not for a 19 year old and a 17 year old having anal sex.

Lots of people took the bait here.

This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 4:26 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/18/20 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

Lots of people took the bait here.

I followed my time honored rule.

If linky shaky, search for original information.

And yeah. Link...….blows
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 2/19/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Basically now the law differentiates between vaginal and anal/oral sex with teenagers 15 or older.

So currently, a judge can use discretion for a 19 year old and 17 year old having vaginal sex and not for a 19 year old and a 17 year old having anal sex.
So, now, if the 17yo girlfriend fricks her 19yo boyfriend and daddy don’t like it, the boyfriend is eligible for judicial discretion on the offender list, but if she just gives him a hummer, he is stuck on the list for life.

That makes a LOT of sense, and we should actively opposed the radical legislation which would expand that discretion to hummers.

And OP ... 19 vs 17 is not pedophilia.
This post was edited on 2/19/20 at 7:59 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram