quote:
define fairly? A bad call, even an egregious one (see 2019 NFC CG) doesn't mean the game wasn't called fairly. And the only call tOSU has a legitimate beef is scoop and score fumble that was over turned. The targeting is a bad rule but called correctly.

What about 3 awful calls that were all on plays that greatly benefited Clemson and changed the game?

1. Targeting - egregious hands to the face not called on Young. Targeting would have stood, but replay the down

2. Roughing the kicker - OSU player was thrown down by his facemask and no call

3. Scoop and score - you covered adequately.

As I said, I agree OSU should have won in spite of these bad calls, and they didn't execute well enough. However, you shouldn't have to also beat the refs (as the Saints do because of Bountygate a decade ago)

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by H-Town Tiger

Member since Nov 2003

59130 posts

Posted on 1/3/20 at 12:58 pm to Buckeye06

quote:
What about 3 awful calls that were all on plays that greatly benefited Clemson and changed the game?

As i said only do you have a legitimate beef is the scoop and score. Whining about missed calls doesn't change the fact that yes it was targeting by rule and yes OSU roughed the punter. I mean why are they trying to block a punt at that point in the game anyway?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by dukke v

PLUTO

Member since Jul 2006

203418 posts

Posted on 1/3/20 at 1:02 pm to Buckeye06

You really sound like a crybaby about this game. the refs blew on call. You had a chance to win the game being up 16-0. You will not look at the mistakes that OSU made that could have won the game. Come on dude. You are better than this.

1 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board