If the Iraqi government does not meet its obligations of protecting the American embassy, then the United States should take action against them and make it on a level consistent with what Iran gets now. Just a question of whether it's kinetic, cyber or sanctions.

Willfully refusing to defend a foreign nation's embassy when they're under siege is essentially an act of terrorism if not an outright act of war.

I don't care who you are or what the current situation is, that is a diplomatic red line that cannot be crossed and must be punished if its crossed.

This post was edited on 12/31/19 at 11:06 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by SabiDojo

Open to any suggestions.

Member since Nov 2010

84069 posts

Posted on 12/31/19 at 11:17 am to Sentrius

Reports are 100 QFR Marines are en route or already there

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Unknown_Poster

Member since Jun 2013

5758 posts

Posted on 12/31/19 at 12:18 pm to Sentrius

quote:
If the Iraqi government does not meet its obligations of protecting the American embassy, then the United States should take action against them and make it on a level consistent with what Iran gets now. Just a question of whether it's kinetic, cyber or sanctions.

Willfully refusing to defend a foreign nation's embassy when they're under siege is essentially an act of terrorism if not an outright act of war.

I don't care who you are or what the current situation is, that is a diplomatic red line that cannot be crossed and must be punished if its crossed.

You sound like an even bigger shill for Raytheon than Lindsey Graham

1 ...

Report Post

O-T Lounge - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board