Started By
Message

re: Tankless Water Heater

Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:41 am to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18087 posts
Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:41 am to
Everyone's situation is different. You need to know how much energy you currently use for water heating to make a good decision.

For me, a 50 gallon tank is always the winner. I have NG and my therm usage for water heating is rather low. I use about 10-12 therm/month to heat water. At around $0.70/therm, I'm spending less than $10/month on average to heat water.

So for me, if a tankless was 100% more energy efficient, I'd save $5/month. Reality is tankless is about 25% more efficient which would save me $2/month.

Last I looked a tankless would be around $600 more than traditional in my area (could be as high as $1200). The payback would range between 10 year best case and 25 years worst case.

Considering I never run out of hot water, even with 3 kids, using a traditional heater and 1.5gpm shower heads, I cannot find any justification for my situation to change to tankless. In my area I would only recommend it for new builds or situations where you are trying to save space.
This post was edited on 12/19/19 at 8:43 am
Posted by parrotdr
Cesspool of Rationalization
Member since Oct 2003
7520 posts
Posted on 12/20/19 at 11:06 am to
I've had a Rinnai Tankless for 13 years now. No problems whatsoever. I used to have the conventional tanked heater in a house with me, my wife, and two boys. Between baths, showers, washer, dishwasher, etc, by the time I would bathe I wouldn't have enough hot water. Luke warm baths SUCK.

It's nice to never run out of hot water. Plus, as my water heater was always in a third story attic, I don't have to worry about a busted tank flooding my house.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram