- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tankless Water Heater
Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:41 am to BatonRougeBuckeye
Posted on 12/19/19 at 8:41 am to BatonRougeBuckeye
Everyone's situation is different. You need to know how much energy you currently use for water heating to make a good decision.
For me, a 50 gallon tank is always the winner. I have NG and my therm usage for water heating is rather low. I use about 10-12 therm/month to heat water. At around $0.70/therm, I'm spending less than $10/month on average to heat water.
So for me, if a tankless was 100% more energy efficient, I'd save $5/month. Reality is tankless is about 25% more efficient which would save me $2/month.
Last I looked a tankless would be around $600 more than traditional in my area (could be as high as $1200). The payback would range between 10 year best case and 25 years worst case.
Considering I never run out of hot water, even with 3 kids, using a traditional heater and 1.5gpm shower heads, I cannot find any justification for my situation to change to tankless. In my area I would only recommend it for new builds or situations where you are trying to save space.
For me, a 50 gallon tank is always the winner. I have NG and my therm usage for water heating is rather low. I use about 10-12 therm/month to heat water. At around $0.70/therm, I'm spending less than $10/month on average to heat water.
So for me, if a tankless was 100% more energy efficient, I'd save $5/month. Reality is tankless is about 25% more efficient which would save me $2/month.
Last I looked a tankless would be around $600 more than traditional in my area (could be as high as $1200). The payback would range between 10 year best case and 25 years worst case.
Considering I never run out of hot water, even with 3 kids, using a traditional heater and 1.5gpm shower heads, I cannot find any justification for my situation to change to tankless. In my area I would only recommend it for new builds or situations where you are trying to save space.
This post was edited on 12/19/19 at 8:43 am
Posted on 12/20/19 at 11:06 am to notsince98
I've had a Rinnai Tankless for 13 years now. No problems whatsoever. I used to have the conventional tanked heater in a house with me, my wife, and two boys. Between baths, showers, washer, dishwasher, etc, by the time I would bathe I wouldn't have enough hot water. Luke warm baths SUCK.
It's nice to never run out of hot water. Plus, as my water heater was always in a third story attic, I don't have to worry about a busted tank flooding my house.
It's nice to never run out of hot water. Plus, as my water heater was always in a third story attic, I don't have to worry about a busted tank flooding my house.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News