- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The societal cost for women deciding to behave sexually like men
Posted on 12/3/19 at 9:06 am to Revelator
Posted on 12/3/19 at 9:06 am to Revelator
So it's okay for men to act like horn dogs, but women must be prim and proper?
Historically, slavery has been looked on positively. "Historically" is not a good barometer.
Link?
quote:
Men have traditionally been sexual creatures and historically, they have been the sexual aggressors.
Historically, slavery has been looked on positively. "Historically" is not a good barometer.
quote:
women decided it was ok for men to treat them as whores.
Link?
Posted on 12/3/19 at 9:18 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
So it's okay for men to act like horn dogs, but women must be prim and proper?
it's not really good for either, but it's much worse for women, due to biological factors
1. parental investment is MUCH higher for women
2. women have a much more limited time frame in the SMP compared to men
2-parent homes of married people lead to, by far, better outcomes for children. there is nothing we can do to help massive amounts of our child population who are not born into this paradigm. encouraging behavior that increases that population is bad for society and the children produced by the behaviors. this applies to both sexes but it impacts one sex much more than the other.
Posted on 12/3/19 at 10:13 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
So it's okay for men to act like horn dogs, but women must be prim and proper?
From a biological/evolutionary perspective, its always been the role of the male OF ANY SPECIES to spread as much seed as he can.
Since women only have one egg at a time and a gestation period of 9 months, it makes total sense from an evolutionary/biological perspective that women are more selective
This is why this classic feminist analogy you decided to use here falls flat on its face
Posted on 12/3/19 at 10:18 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
So it's okay for men to act like horn dogs, but women must be prim and proper
At a basic evolutionary level? Yes. I'm not saying prim and proper but women absolutely should use judgment and discretion.
Men will frick anything. Women are supposed to choose which men to frick.
Men make sure the seed is spread. Women are supposed to make sure the best seeds are being spread.
This is not some surprising or unique ideal. It's repeated infinitly through nature.
Choosing to go against nature is a uniquely human trait.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News