- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/9/19 at 12:35 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
He's probably going to argue it more narrowly. Something about removing DACA violates title IX or something convoluted that the plaintiff doesn't even argue, but he invents to come up with a reason.
I know its John Roberts we're talking about here but I just can't see him going "There" that the constitution is obviously very clear on. That would be akin to a brutal stab in the back that just cannot be ignored.
He's on thin enough ice with republicans and conservatives as it is. If he rules like that and GOP wins all three political branches in the house, senate, and Presidency, good chance there will be a strong movement to impeach and remove him from office.
Republicans removing a republican should be a no brainer.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 12:37 pm to WPBTiger
Foreign interference in an American court? Shocked!
Our legislative branch will be moot if Trump (or any future president) isn't allowed to overturn his predecessor's executive orders.
Our legislative branch will be moot if Trump (or any future president) isn't allowed to overturn his predecessor's executive orders.
This post was edited on 11/9/19 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 11/9/19 at 12:58 pm to themunch
quote:
What do they offer for this quid pro thing?
They promised to try and do something about how smelly they are.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 1:02 pm to WPBTiger
So basically Mexico is telling the US...we’ll never defeat the US through illegal occupation if your legal system fails to cooperate. Lol!
Posted on 11/9/19 at 1:02 pm to WPBTiger
Someone needs to start a list of what foreign influence is acceptable and when it is illegal.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 1:42 pm to WPBTiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/26/20 at 11:15 am
Posted on 11/9/19 at 2:04 pm to Sentrius
quote:
He's on thin enough ice with republicans and conservatives as it is. If he rules like that and GOP wins all three political branches in the house, senate, and Presidency, good chance there will be a strong movement to impeach and remove him from office.
No one is removing a SCOTUS judge for rulings they don't like or are unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 2:07 pm to Sentrius
quote:
I know its John Roberts we're talking about here but I just can't see him going "There" that the constitution is obviously very clear on. That would be akin to a brutal stab in the back that just cannot be ignored.
He's on thin enough ice with republicans and conservatives as it is. If he rules like that and GOP wins all three political branches in the house, senate, and Presidency, good chance there will be a strong movement to impeach and remove him from office.
Republicans removing a republican should be a no brainer.
John Roberts isn't going anywhere. They aren't going to remove a Supreme Court justice, especially the Chief. It just ain't happening.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 2:52 pm to TSLG
quote:
From June 2012 to August 2019, the Government of Mexico has invested $2.175 million dollars for Mexican DACA recipients.
There are at least 700,000 DACAn people. Mexico spent about $3 person...over 7 years. 42 cents a person per year is something that's supposed to impress us?
Posted on 11/9/19 at 7:51 pm to BurningHeart
quote:
Libbies... that should tell you something when a foreign government pushes for certain programs within the USA...
Like Mexico pushing for the US Congress to sign the updated NAFTA( USMCA)?
Posted on 11/9/19 at 7:55 pm to WPBTiger
This never should have made it to the Supreme Court in the first place.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 8:15 pm to udtiger
quote:
A President can either rescind a prior EO of a previous President, or he cannot.
The President can either make immutable law, or he cannot.
That's as simple as it gets.
Thank you
The decision is that and has zero to do with kids, any one of the justices that even considers this aspect should be impeached.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 9:19 pm to cave canem
quote:
quote:
A President can either rescind a prior EO of a previous President, or he cannot.
The President can either make immutable law, or he cannot.
That's as simple as it gets.
Thank you
The decision is that and has zero to do with kids, any one of the justices that even considers this aspect should be impeached.
Seriously,
If I am the attorney doing oral argument, that's my argument. That's it.
Posted on 11/9/19 at 9:29 pm to TSLG
quote:
From June 2012 to August 2019, the Government of Mexico has invested $2.175 million dollars for Mexican DACA recipients.
What is your point here? that they pay their way or that they do not pay enough? Mexico will have to multiply that by about 100 just to make it even laughable as an argument.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News