Started By
Message

re: The goal should be one qb per recruiting cycle

Posted on 10/31/19 at 11:19 am to
Posted by paper tiger
acadiana
Member since Feb 2006
1086 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 11:19 am to
quote:

While I strongly agree with the sentiment, more often than not something will happen to screw things up. More important is what you have on the roster. I think 4 is ideal. You can get by with 3 like this year, if you are confident with everyone. 2 like last year is a problem because it starts to effect your play calling and a couple of unlucky injuries and you will have a wr, like KY, running the offense.

So I believe we need 2 this year. Even if DJ Uiagalelei shocked us and committed to us we should try to get 2 because that may spook Parish after the spring


There is certainly an advantage to bringing in two qbs this year. It might end up being a very smart move.

But its all about risk assessment and balancing risks.

One thing appears almost certain at this point. A very good player who wants to come to LSU will not have a spot because we are taking two qbs. It might be a 4 star offensive lineman, a running back, an edge rusher or another defensive tackle that wants in.

So yes, there is value in taking an extra qb and reasons to do so. But there is also risk. One of these two qbs will probably never play a down for LSU and the cost will be a lineman or running back or someone else left out because there is no room at the inn.

In some years it would be less a big deal than a year like this. I cannot recall a class filling up so quickly and having so many quality recruits still interested.

Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
96978 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 11:36 am to
Agree for most cycles but we definitely need 2 here. Never know which one will be a bust and which one will excel.
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 10/31/19 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

There is certainly an advantage to bringing in two qbs this year. It might end up being a very smart move.

But its all about risk assessment and balancing risks.

This is exactly what I'm doing. You just have a different risk assessment than I do.

quote:

One thing appears almost certain at this point. A very good player who wants to come to LSU will not have a spot because we are taking two qbs. It might be a 4 star offensive lineman, a running back, an edge rusher or another defensive tackle that wants in.

So yes, there is value in taking an extra qb and reasons to do so. But there is also risk. One of these two qbs will probably never play a down for LSU and the cost will be a lineman or running back or someone else left out because there is no room at the inn.

In some years it would be less a big deal than a year like this. I cannot recall a class filling up so quickly and having so many quality recruits still interested.

It's not the 5star sure prospect that will be turned away, but the lowest ranked (by the coaches) at the position of least need (or at least some sort of combo of these kinds of factors when the decision is made.)
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9598 posts
Posted on 11/4/19 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

A very good player who wants to come to LSU will not have a spot because we are taking two qbs. It might be a 4 star offensive lineman, a running back, an edge rusher or another defensive tackle that wants in.



I thought about this a couple weeks ago when we had two commits that week and got to 24 and started looking, there were two Recruits that looked like you could drop because of the numbers... one of those guys was a QB...

if its me (and Im no roster genius obviously) i take the extra lineman/Rusher in stead of having 4 QB's... especially losing Thomas last week...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram