- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New MSY in game thread
Posted on 11/5/19 at 9:50 am to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 11/5/19 at 9:50 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Instead, our bureaucrats (NOT the airlines) chose a fourth alternative completely opposite of everything that made basically everything existing useless or obsolete.
People who continue to push this false narrative drive me crazy.
The airlines have a majority in interest (MII) clause that allows them to approve or reject any major capital project that could impact their rates and charges. Like a new parking deck, refreshed terminals, or yes, a brand new terimal. The airlines all signed off on the alternative that was ultimately selected.
Did the envision that the shithead duo of Landrieu/Jindal would bone the development/roadway access as badly as they did? Certainly not.
All that said, it is still going to be a shitshow for the next three to four years. So prepare yourself, New Orleans.... you should have expected it.
Posted on 11/5/19 at 10:10 am to SM6
quote:
quote:
Instead, our bureaucrats (NOT the airlines) chose a fourth alternative completely opposite of everything that made basically everything existing useless or obsolete.
People who continue to push this false narrative drive me crazy.
The airlines have a majority in interest (MII) clause that allows them to approve or reject any major capital project that could impact their rates and charges. Like a new parking deck, refreshed terminals, or yes, a brand new terimal. The airlines all signed off on the alternative that was ultimately selected.
That's not a "false narrative."
There were 4 proposed options that could have met approval by the airlines. Our powers that be chose the ONE that was most costly; that would make existing infrastructure useless and/or much more inconvenient for everyone; and that would require costly and time consuming additional infrastructure at additional costs that was not even planned for once the construction commenced.
That's the truth. It was absolutely the worst possible option. I won't speculate on why this was chosen (others have, and there may be credence to those theories, but at this point it doesn't matter), but the fact remains that this was a terrible choice given what was in place and what could have easily been foreseen.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)