- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This sham of a closed hearing would be similar to this...
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:40 am to LSU2ALA
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:40 am to LSU2ALA
quote:
You and I both know that’s not in the Constitution, but we also know that it says the House makes it’s own rules and is the sole entity allowed to impeach so they can basically do it how they want. Whether or not the optics are good is another matter.
I don't disagree with this at all, but what they are doing is still without any historical precedent whatsoever and, I would argue, is probably not a precedent we really want to establish.
Oh, well. As long as there's even a chance it can hurt the bad orange guy, that's all that matters.
3
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:43 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I don't disagree with this at all, but what they are doing is still without any historical precedent whatsoever and, I would argue, is probably not a precedent we really want to establish.
again
the next Benghazi will be lit, fam, and i better not hear any DEMs trying to say it's improper procedure
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:43 am to Y.A. Tittle
I can't wait until the GOP takes the House again.
The Democrats will regret the precedent that this sets.
Paybacks are a bitch. The next DEM President will be impeached from day one.
The Democrats will regret the precedent that this sets.
Paybacks are a bitch. The next DEM President will be impeached from day one.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:45 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I don't disagree with this at all, but what they are doing is still without any historical precedent whatsoever and, I would argue, is probably not a precedent we really want to establish.
I don’t disagree with you either. I don’t have a problem with the closed sessions at the beginning to pin witness testimony down to make sure everyone doesn’t know what everyone else is saying.
That’s just for the beginning though. They really need to bring the witnesses they feel are key out into public hearings. They aren’t required to, but I feel having an impeachment vote after only closed door hearings would look really bad and be political malpractice.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News