- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This sham of a closed hearing would be similar to this...
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:35 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
sorry, i meant House, not all of Congress (including Senate)
show me in the Constitution where it says one party (not entire body) gets to act as the prosecution and the other is left out of the process
Show me where is says every single member of the full house must be a part of any and every investigation. Those members who don't wish to push article of impeachment have no role as prosecutors in this scenario. That's for the white house counsel as the defense during the trial.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:38 am to Mickey Goldmill
Everything you typed is wrong. I wont break a sweat on this because I know that if roles were reversed, you would take the exact opposite view.
The constitution gives the House authority to impeach. Not a committee, not a sub-committee, not a chairman, and certainly not a dozen partisans from the opposition party.
The constitution gives the House authority to impeach. Not a committee, not a sub-committee, not a chairman, and certainly not a dozen partisans from the opposition party.
Posted on 10/23/19 at 9:42 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Those members who don't wish to push article of impeachment have no role as prosecutors in this scenario.
holy
fricking
shite
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)