Started By
Message

re: McCarthy, Nunes, Jordan Demand Answers on Whistleblower Complaint Form Changes McCarthy an

Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:56 pm to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

Wuuch was obviously not the transcript.

Didn't you say in the other thread facts are what matters?

The transcript is FACT.

The complaint is second hand bullshite.


It's sad AF that you can't read and that I have to post this for the 35th time.

The complaint alleges that...
Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"

The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".

Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62724 posts
Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:59 pm to
Play ball was for corruption. Can’t give aid to corrupt individuals...Plus, Ukraine didn’t know aid had a hold on it till released at request of a Utah senator
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99779 posts
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

t's sad AF that you can't read and that I have to post this for the 35th time.

The complaint alleges that...
Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"

The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".

Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?


What's sad as frick is you are a fricking idiot.

It's not in the transcript because it didn't happen.

The two principals to the phone call say it didn't happen.

Not a single person that was in the room has said it happened or reported to the ICIG that it happened.

The only person that claims it happened is a person that wasn't in the room, wasn't on the call, and has completely missed on key details of the call (including who was on it).

Oh...and that person is apparently insisting on anonymity and to not disclose their "sources".

Your regurgitation of the same bullshite is evidence you are nothing but a shill.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 8:02 pm
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".

Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?


Well an anonymous whistle blower with anonymous 2nd hand sources made grand promises about the phone call....then the transcript was released. Oooops!

And the guy being strong armed didn't even know the $$ was being withheld. We should impeach Trump for sucking at extortion! At least Biden made his play known dammit.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
7655 posts
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:47 pm to
All of that is spin. The complaint “alleges”, blah, blah, blah. Nothing concrete or remotely so, just what the Dems and you want everyone to believe
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6806 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 7:45 am to
quote:

The complaint alleges that... Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"


Is this the democrat argument now? Biden admitting on video that he was withholding a billion dollars in aid unless they fired a prosecutor is A-OK, but Trump threatening to withhold a phone call is treason and impeachment-worthy?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram