- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McCarthy, Nunes, Jordan Demand Answers on Whistleblower Complaint Form Changes McCarthy an
Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:56 pm to udtiger
Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:56 pm to udtiger
quote:
Wuuch was obviously not the transcript.
Didn't you say in the other thread facts are what matters?
The transcript is FACT.
The complaint is second hand bullshite.
It's sad AF that you can't read and that I have to post this for the 35th time.
The complaint alleges that...
Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".
Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 7:59 pm to bmy
Play ball was for corruption. Can’t give aid to corrupt individuals...Plus, Ukraine didn’t know aid had a hold on it till released at request of a Utah senator
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:01 pm to bmy
quote:
t's sad AF that you can't read and that I have to post this for the 35th time.
The complaint alleges that...
Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".
Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?
What's sad as frick is you are a fricking idiot.
It's not in the transcript because it didn't happen.
The two principals to the phone call say it didn't happen.
Not a single person that was in the room has said it happened or reported to the ICIG that it happened.
The only person that claims it happened is a person that wasn't in the room, wasn't on the call, and has completely missed on key details of the call (including who was on it).
Oh...and that person is apparently insisting on anonymity and to not disclose their "sources".
Your regurgitation of the same bullshite is evidence you are nothing but a shill.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 8:02 pm
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:06 pm to bmy
quote:
The phrase "depends on" mean that the phone call we have transcripts of was contingent upon Ukraine being willing to "play ball".
Why would you expect to see a quid pro quo in the actual transcript?
Well an anonymous whistle blower with anonymous 2nd hand sources made grand promises about the phone call....then the transcript was released. Oooops!
And the guy being strong armed didn't even know the $$ was being withheld. We should impeach Trump for sucking at extortion! At least Biden made his play known dammit.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 8:47 pm to bmy
All of that is spin. The complaint “alleges”, blah, blah, blah. Nothing concrete or remotely so, just what the Dems and you want everyone to believe
Posted on 10/2/19 at 7:45 am to bmy
quote:
The complaint alleges that... Ukrainian officials were "led to believe that a meeting or phone call between" Trump and Zelensky would depend on Zelensky's willingness to "play ball"
Is this the democrat argument now? Biden admitting on video that he was withholding a billion dollars in aid unless they fired a prosecutor is A-OK, but Trump threatening to withhold a phone call is treason and impeachment-worthy?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)