- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s becoming clear there is no whistleblower
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:28 am to bmy
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:28 am to bmy
quote:
How so?
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
How people like you, bmy, either don’t see the insanity going on here, or blatantly support it, is shocking to me.
Hell, even hawkeye007, an avowed Trump hater, sees this for what it is.
You just try to play the non-partisan card while coming at every thread from the progressive viewpoint.
Like a more disingenuous version of DisplacedBuckeye. At least he is open about his act.
When did you progressives become such avowed supporters of the CIA?
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 9:34 am
4
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:40 am to Scruffy
quote:where did you see that?
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 9:57 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
It doesn't have to be 100% first hand or second hand. The complaint suggests most of the info is second hand, and now the whistleblower says some is first hand. I mean, I know most and some are really ambiguous at this stage, but I don't think it's fair to say that the whistleblower is contradictory based on the language used.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 10:30 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint.
Scruff, the word just prior to the weekend is that this whistleblower was working in the White House and was a CIA person assigned there. I am going to wager that this person and others KNEW that Trump had migrated a lot of transcripts to the secure server to avoid glory hounding staff from accessing it and leaking it. Prior to the change in the rules/law, this person could not announce this stuff because he/she would have been arrested....dismissed. But once the law was changed, it cvould be used as a whistle blower thing. They ( Schiff & Co) had been waiting for this. If you read the complaint they had been preparing for this since February when Mueller & Co. were leaking out that the report may not be what Democrats, et al were looking for.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:02 am to Scruffy
quote:
Now the whistleblower is claiming to have first hand knowledge, which is counter to the entire written complaint
Isn't this the IG saying that the whistleblower did have at least some first hand information?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News