- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is it possible the Whistleblower DID have first hand knowledge
Posted on 9/28/19 at 11:40 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Posted on 9/28/19 at 11:40 am to BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
quote:Negative. First hand knowledge is no longer requisite. That rule changed in August.
Whistleblowers are supposed to have first hand knowledge of wrong doings.
quote:Very doubtful. Risk-reward misaligned.
I think the WB is lying and possibly trying to conceal his identity by claiming to have been informed.
1
Posted on 9/28/19 at 11:50 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Negative. First hand knowledge is no longer requisite. That rule changed in August.
Yes, very convenient timing wouldn't you say?
quote:
Very doubtful. Risk-reward misaligned.
I'm not saying it was a well thought out plan. These people are idiots who still think they can somehow crawl out of the hole they've dug themselves into. I mean, Adam Schiff thought it was a good plan to go up there and read a completely false version of the phone call. They're not the brightest people.
What do you make then of Trump even saying this person was not informed by any white house officials? That this person is a partisan operative?
This post was edited on 9/28/19 at 11:54 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News