Started By
Message

re: The New York Times.... of all media...

Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:35 pm to
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
14930 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

You don't think the NYTimes, given it's history, would try to sanitize 9/11 and divert from the obvious?


The article called it an attack.
The article called it terrorism.

The tweet was rightfully edited but unless there was a massive overhaul to the original content of this article that you want to make us aware of, I'm not inclined to suggest they are trying to sanitize anything.

This post was edited on 9/11/19 at 12:36 pm
Posted by pjab
Member since Mar 2016
5656 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 12:52 pm to
The article was edited too.

Also, commandeer does not have the same connotation as hijack. You can bend both definitions to mean the same thing but they are not the same thing.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53076 posts
Posted on 9/11/19 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

The tweet was rightfully edited


"edited". Yeah, it was deleted because of the backlash they were getting. They thought they could get away with it, and saw rather quickly, that that was a terrible mistake.

It's ok to admit when you were wrong, like you did earlier. Yet you seem to be backtracking on that now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram