re: So what’s the deal with a WWL employee calling Seth Dunlap a bad name?

quote:

---

Where is the proof?

---

An IP address that is specifically connected to his Cell Phone tweeted it out.

quote:

---

Looks to me like they are trying to discredit Seth to get out of paying him the $1.8m.

---

They didn't "have to pay him 1.8m". That was the first settlement demand by his attorney which is always outrageous.

quote:

---

Seth passed a lie detector in which he said he didn't do it and that he never had the twitter password

---

A home lie detector test, which is inadmissable in LITERALLY every court in America, is complete junk science and utterly worthless. They only have one purpose by attorneys: to sway public opinion.

You can craft the questions to give misleading "truthful answers", give your client the questions ahead of time to coach them in how to answer, and interpret the results subjectively.

In short it is designed to fool idiots but has no bearing on anything.

quote:

---

In fact, Entercom offered him a settlement which he turned down.

---

You don't know that, first of all, and there's no record of it.

Second, this is extremely common. I get offers all of the time on cases where they are denying any wrongdoing. There is value in making something go away.

quote:

---

WWL has NEVER asked any of the people with Twitter access if they did it.

---

Why would they? They hired one of the best digital forensic guys in the area with an impeccable reputation, and he confirmed it was Dunlap's phone.

They then found video of him going into his office, closing the door, then the tweet comes out, and he emerges to show people the tweet.


IF Entercom was simply using this as a defense, they would have just used it over the course of litigation.

They went the extra step of creating a Police Report and then referring it for criminal investigation.

In short, shut the frick up.