Started By
Message

re: Judge Tigar defies federal appeals court, reinstates injunction against asylum ban

Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:41 pm to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

So what “new evidence” was presented? The appeals court already made the decision, why wasn’t this evidence part of the original suit?
The new evidence is laid out in detail in the 14 page District Court opinion. You would be aware of this, if you had bothered to read the opinion.

The District Court was able to hear and admit additional evidence, because this was not the result of a final trial. It was a result of a preliminary injunction hearing. Additional evidence is always admissible at that level.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 9/9/19 at 6:47 pm to
quote:


The new evidence is laid out in detail in the 14 page District Court opinion. You would be aware of this, if you had bothered to read the opinion

Hogwash. This silliness could be done for every case ever to exist.

frick him

Ignore it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram