Started By
Message

re: Should have been a interception

Posted on 9/8/19 at 9:59 am to
Posted by PenguinPubes
Frozen Tundra
Member since Jan 2018
10813 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 9:59 am to
Those who watched it on tv, what did it look like?
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Member since Feb 2006
11782 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 9:59 am to
I didn’t think it was a interception
Posted by rohinaz
Scottsdale,az
Member since Dec 2013
243 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:00 am to
Ball hit the ground. 1 camera angle had it clearly
Posted by LSUcajun77
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2008
21309 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:00 am to
An interception BUT you lose the ball for a split second in the replay so I understood why they couldn’t make the call.

ETA I missed the angle that showed it hit the ground.
This post was edited on 9/8/19 at 10:02 am
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32455 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:02 am to
On TV, the ball clearly touched the ground, they showed it several times. Stingley had possession of it, but one half of the football was on the ground. Otherwise would have been one of the most bad arse INTs in recent memory.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8623 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:05 am to
It 100% touched the ground. Indisputable.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:06 am to
It was close. Don’t have a problem with it being called incomplete.

Watching live on TV I thought it was pick reminiscent of Eric Ried in 2011.

What baffles me was how they called it complete to the WR on the original call.

Posted by FWBTigah
Member since Oct 2017
934 posts
Posted on 9/8/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Those who watched it on tv, what did it look like?


Not even close to a pick
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram