- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Google does not like TigerDroppings - blacklists it!
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:15 pm to sacrathetic
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:15 pm to sacrathetic
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
Simply Googling "examples of Google/Facebook/Twitter bias" only returns articles about how they aren't biased. Imagine that.
Simply Googling "examples of Google/Facebook/Twitter bias" only returns articles about how they aren't biased. Imagine that.
4
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:25 pm to GRTiger
quote:Well it worked. He's never coming back to the thread. When he says "link?", that's usually his last comment in the thread. It's his white flag. Once you can prove him wrong, poof.
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
Simply Googling "examples of Google/Facebook/Twitter bias" only returns articles about how they aren't biased. Imagine that.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
You don’t think it’s important to actually have support for a claim?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:31 pm to GRTiger
quote:WTF? I searched "examples of google bias" and of my top 10 results, 5 claimed there is bias, 3 claimed no bias, and 2 were kind of iffy.
Simply Googling "examples of Google/Facebook/Twitter bias" only returns articles about how they aren't biased. Imagine that.
Either you're lying, or your own search history bias is turning up in your search results.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:37 pm to GRTiger
quote:Did you check Bing?
What's ironic about the entire exercise of humoring Drac's bad faith discussion strategy by providing the links is how hard it was to locate these examples on Google. I had to know the name of the researcher and the specific story about the internal e-mails to get them in a search result.
For future reference, if something is difficult to locate on Google, that generally means that what you're looking for has very little support among the entire rest of the internet/world. This usually means that it is false, or inconsequential / nobody gives a shite.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News