- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bud Elliott Blue Chip Ratio 2019
Posted on 8/14/19 at 6:01 pm to VoodooDoctor
Posted on 8/14/19 at 6:01 pm to VoodooDoctor
quote:
"Hey what about UCF?"
"Oh that team that went unbeaten after going 0-12 just a few years ago?"
"YEAH, THEM!"
"Don't they play in the American Conference with Tulane and UConn
Not a lot different than what I said in my first post in this thread.
This is why the shite system will stay a shite system and the "under 50 hasn't won a championship" mantra will remain intact.
How did the computers, Massey, the algorithms and the "choosers" miss the fact that EVERY team in the playoffs, including the national champion, would lose to Auburn or a team that lost to Auburn - Who Lost to UCF.
Sounds like the system is not too "sound" to me. Team A beats Team B on the same day as the college football playoffs. Team C and Team D play for the national championship. Team B had beaten both of those teams and lost to Team A. But Team A does not get to play in the playoffs.
If you build an org chart for the six teams mentioned above, UCF would be in the box at the very top. Everyone else would not only be below UCF but below Auburn.
Clemson and OU would be at the very bottom. At the very least UCF should have replaced one of those teams. I don't care what the computers or 24/7 say.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 6:13 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 6:14 pm to Tiger Ree
LSU beat Georgia who beat Florida who beat LSU.
LINK
In 2015:
Oklahoma lost to Texas, which lost to Iowa State, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than Big 12 champ Oklahoma.
Michigan State lost to Nebraska, which lost to Purdue, which lost to Bowling Green, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than Big 10 Champ Michigan State.
Alabama lost to Ole Miss, which lost to Arkansas, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than SEC champion and national champion Alabama.
Why wasn’t Toledo in the 2015 CFP discussion??
LINK
In 2015:
Oklahoma lost to Texas, which lost to Iowa State, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than Big 12 champ Oklahoma.
Michigan State lost to Nebraska, which lost to Purdue, which lost to Bowling Green, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than Big 10 Champ Michigan State.
Alabama lost to Ole Miss, which lost to Arkansas, which lost to Toledo; therefore Toledo is better than SEC champion and national champion Alabama.
Why wasn’t Toledo in the 2015 CFP discussion??
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 6:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News