- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr who was once an evolutionist explains why mankind is no accident
Posted on 7/4/19 at 8:33 pm to SlapahoeTribe
Posted on 7/4/19 at 8:33 pm to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
What if I believe in both evolution and the Grand Architect?
The problem is that evolution and a literal historical Genesis are mutually exclusive.
If a Christian has no problem regarding much of the OT as allegory, there’s no conflict.
2
Posted on 7/4/19 at 9:13 pm to Roger Klarvin
How so?
Would it be possible that when the book of genesis was written, the people’s concepts of time was vastly different than ours (Noah being like 900yrs old)? Also, God created everything within one week in a specific order. Not a literal week, but what one would conceive as a week for a higher power living in eternity. This specific order is confirmed by science, for not one thing is out of order in the Bible to what scientist believe as the order of evolution.
Would it be possible that when the book of genesis was written, the people’s concepts of time was vastly different than ours (Noah being like 900yrs old)? Also, God created everything within one week in a specific order. Not a literal week, but what one would conceive as a week for a higher power living in eternity. This specific order is confirmed by science, for not one thing is out of order in the Bible to what scientist believe as the order of evolution.
Posted on 7/4/19 at 11:41 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:where do people get this stuff from? some very smart people have been what are called theistic evolutionists. they completely disagree with your characterization. the problem is in your use of the word literal. iow, that adam was figurative or metaphorical. theistic evolutionists believe in a literal adam and that he was ultimately formed from the dust of the ground.
The problem is that evolution and a literal historical Genesis are mutually exclusive
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News