- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: law suit against the cake baker filed. "Won't bake a cake for Satan's birthday"
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:54 pm to the808bass
Posted on 6/14/19 at 12:54 pm to the808bass
quote:
Juicy being a fricking moron is nothing new.
Nah
Juice knows that the courts have hit on the "creation" point.
Juice, as always, just doesn't give a frick. Juice is a totalitarian and totalitarian's really don't give a frick HOW they rule you, just that they do.
Posted on 6/14/19 at 1:08 pm to ShortyRob
Do you believe social media should not be able to moderate their own product?
Do you believe someone outside of their purview should control how they moderate their own product?
Should the government be involved?
What sliding scale should be implemented as far as the moderation? IE, where is the arbitrary line drawn by the outside moderators?
Do you realize how ridiculous it would be to support something like this?
Do you believe someone outside of their purview should control how they moderate their own product?
Should the government be involved?
What sliding scale should be implemented as far as the moderation? IE, where is the arbitrary line drawn by the outside moderators?
Do you realize how ridiculous it would be to support something like this?
Posted on 6/14/19 at 1:13 pm to ShortyRob
I do not have the time, nor the inclination to search the web for all this crap so, if anyone knows, thanks for helping out.
1. First lawsuit was brought by the commission based on complaint (think it is same person who complained). Supreme Court says no and sends back and that ends that.
2. Another complaint to Commission and they sue again. Baker countersues and they agree to go their own way.
3. THIS CLUSTER!. Is this a private suit by heshe or is this another complaint to the commission and they sued?
I cannot imagine the commission getting involved in anything forcing the baker to make a cake.
If private, I am not sure there are grounds for satan making cakes. Also, this would be frivilous and subject both the person and the lawyer to sanctions (assume this will be moved to federal court).
If this is the commission, let me know. I find that very hard to believe. And, if not the commission, does heshe have any standing?
1. First lawsuit was brought by the commission based on complaint (think it is same person who complained). Supreme Court says no and sends back and that ends that.
2. Another complaint to Commission and they sue again. Baker countersues and they agree to go their own way.
3. THIS CLUSTER!. Is this a private suit by heshe or is this another complaint to the commission and they sued?
I cannot imagine the commission getting involved in anything forcing the baker to make a cake.
If private, I am not sure there are grounds for satan making cakes. Also, this would be frivilous and subject both the person and the lawyer to sanctions (assume this will be moved to federal court).
If this is the commission, let me know. I find that very hard to believe. And, if not the commission, does heshe have any standing?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)