- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 1st quarter GDP: 3.2%
Posted on 4/27/19 at 6:01 am to bfniii
Posted on 4/27/19 at 6:01 am to bfniii
quote:
really, because i'm looking at your "know what else" thread and it has NOTHING about jobs numbers, housing market, trade, stocks, manufacturing, etc. nada. also, i've seen several of your stupid threads and the op almost invariably discusses gdp and forecasts and that's about it.
for the second time, take a look at my tracker thread, which, in addition to being regularly updated upon the release of varying types of data, contained in its OP a review of recent trends in:
personal consumption data
capital investment data
personal income data
manufacturer's orders
and the projections from several alternative forecasting houses
quote:
usually a response to someone else who brought it up.
you sure are comfortable for being so consistently, objectively wrong. i bumped that thread with updates and recaps of what new data drove the updates consistently, whether upward or downward. this is the kind of info that posters like you instinctively go apoplectic over, and eventually whine enough to have anchored. then, accuse me of only talking about the negative stuff.
quote:
you are a serial liar
thicc projection, just like the one about being one-sided in the things i bring up
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:19 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
90proofprofessional
Fake news
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:19 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:i just cited a thread where you did NONE of that. and i know there are others so don't act like you're all over it. because you aren't and i proved it.
for the second time
quote:and herein lies why you are one of the worst people here:
a review of recent trends in
"Up to"
"Soars up"
you make dumb thread poopooing the gdp. people remind you of the bigger picture. you get mad because no one recognizes your perceived intelligence. wash, rinse, repeat. you're accomplishing nothing. you have no purpose. you contribute nothing of substance mr. confront the data.
quote:and you are freaking delusional. it happens basically every time. you are the most pathological liar of all time. "no you didn't."
you sure are comfortable for being so consistently, objectively wrong
quote:yeah. a thread from march 2019. you have for more than a year been forced by others to recognize the bigger picture.
bumped that thread with updates and recaps of what new data drove the updates consistently
quote:accuse?
accuse me of only talking about the negative stuff
quote:here is your thread from this month that has only gdp in the op. you are a liar
thicc projection, just like the one about being one-sided in the things i bring up
Posted on 4/27/19 at 9:43 am to Bunyan
3.2% is excellent. Especially almost ten years into a growth cycle.
This shows there is no need for the FRB to increase the rate of monetary expansion. Doing so would probably spur inflation which is much easier to start than tamp down.
This shows there is no need for the FRB to increase the rate of monetary expansion. Doing so would probably spur inflation which is much easier to start than tamp down.
Posted on 4/27/19 at 12:02 pm to bfniii
quote:
i just cited a thread where you did NONE of that
literally in response to a post where i pointed you to my tracker
lol, just lol
quote:
people remind you of the bigger picture. you get mad because no one recognizes your perceived intelligence.
lmaooooooooooooooo
to both of those claims
quote:
you have for more than a year been forced by others to recognize the bigger picture.
haha just wow
quote:
that has only gdp in the op
it literally cites in the op the entire month of good news that i discussed in the tracker before you pussies had it anchored!
Posted on 4/27/19 at 12:03 pm to BigAppleBucky
quote:
shows there is no need for the FRB to increase the rate of monetary expansion
definitely hard to argue that rates are too high
This post was edited on 4/27/19 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:30 am to SDVTiger
quote:
You are melting so hard in this thread Hail Trump
I've actually found some respect for 100ProofFraud, he's sustaining a respectable controlled Melt in this thread. When you're a never Trumper economist and Trump keeps dragging his positive economic growth junk across your jowls I can understand how difficult it must be to participate in this thread.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:27 am to cajunangelle
rep mark green is spouting wrong numbers
2017 was 2.2, not 2.5
2018 was 2.9, not 3.0
his 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 numbers are all significantly off as well
also that quote is completely fabricated
just thought you might want to know because we all agree that facts are important
2017 was 2.2, not 2.5
2018 was 2.9, not 3.0
his 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 numbers are all significantly off as well
also that quote is completely fabricated
just thought you might want to know because we all agree that facts are important
This post was edited on 4/28/19 at 11:31 am
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:35 am to 90proofprofessional
90proof, please explain to me the meaningful difference between 2.9 and 3.0
How does a .1 percentage point difference affect me as a worker and a consumer?
How does a .1 percentage point difference affect me as a worker and a consumer?
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:42 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
please explain to me the meaningful difference between 2.9 and 3.0
if by "meaningful" you mean "big", i don't believe there is one
failing to reach that threshold for an annual figure, despite getting 2.9, is merely a marker laid down frequently by obama critics, far as i can tell
so the fact that 2018 failed to reach it is only meaningful in those terms
This post was edited on 4/28/19 at 11:43 am
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:57 am to 90proofprofessional
quote:
failing to reach that threshold for an annual figure, despite getting 2.9, is merely a marker laid down frequently by obama critics, far as i can tell
Perhaps because Obama said talking about 3.0 was irresponsible. He couldn’t do it even with QE.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 12:04 pm to cajunangelle
everything i said about that idiot's tweet is still correct
Posted on 4/28/19 at 12:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Obama said talking about 3.0 was irresponsible
link? i'm not even sure what you mean by "talking about" it. what do you mean
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News