- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas executes white supremacist convicted in gruesome 1998 hate crime
Posted on 4/25/19 at 11:46 am to Bigbee Hills
Posted on 4/25/19 at 11:46 am to Bigbee Hills
quote:
Exactly: Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth. It's natural selection, really, so they need to die.
If your argument is natural selection then reason dictates every white man in here has to support this guy's actions.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 12:46 pm to GarnetStrand
Going by what you quoted, and then what you said, I see no way how you can come to this conclusion. Eta: My retort is, "Wut?"
Did you read the rest? About him (and others like him) who do these incredibly evil, yet horrendously foolish acts that warrant a death penalty? Does the death penalty not cause death, and, therefore, take him out of the gene pool? And so was he not NOT the strongest, fittest, blah blah blah?
It takes a gdamn idiot, among other things, to believe that his heinous act was reasonable and without consequence, does it not?
Is a human being who's executed for capital murder not subjected to the same ignorance of natural laws much like that of a fool who tries to beat an oncoming train is (i.e. don't freaking kill each other unjustly, and don't try to beat a train)?
For sure, they both were not the strongest, fittest, or smartest. For sure, they both are dead, are they not?
Does being strong and fit not require sense-enough to get there, and does sense-enough to stay alive not require, well, some sense? How many fools do we hear about dying every day from absolutley stupid decisions that they made?
Gotta be smart out chea on deze skreets, right? What if you're not? What if you drag a man down the street because he's black?
My analogy was to justify this execution. Killing others unjustly is not an ethical issue, it is a moral one, and it is a cornerstone of humanity's successful domination of the food chain: We cannot live like we do by going around and slaughtering each other willy nilly. (WHEN we do, it is called war, and reasons for war are often times unjust, but the soldiers carrying out their duty are not.) Much like if you breath in water like a fish, if you kill me unjustly, you're breaking a natural law that will get you killed, or at a minimum, get you put away where you'll die inside of yourself by losing your freedom and dignity and humanity.
Just like the fools who die from falling off the edge of the biggest hole in the ground on planet earth, just like the idiot who was mauled to death by a wild hippo that he got idiotically close to in an attempt for an "epic" selfie, the idiot who slaughtered this man is dead because of HIS OWN act of foolishness. He chose his destiny- just like the guy outrunning the train did- and today he paid the Piper.
Today, he is as dead as the jackass in that hippo's mouth was, and it is only natural that it is so.
You might not agree with my opinion on it (perhaps because you don't agree with CP and that's okay because I'm no staunch proponent of it either), but what's not to get?
Because as-is, your analogy is not making one iota's worth of sense to me.
Did you read the rest? About him (and others like him) who do these incredibly evil, yet horrendously foolish acts that warrant a death penalty? Does the death penalty not cause death, and, therefore, take him out of the gene pool? And so was he not NOT the strongest, fittest, blah blah blah?
It takes a gdamn idiot, among other things, to believe that his heinous act was reasonable and without consequence, does it not?
Is a human being who's executed for capital murder not subjected to the same ignorance of natural laws much like that of a fool who tries to beat an oncoming train is (i.e. don't freaking kill each other unjustly, and don't try to beat a train)?
For sure, they both were not the strongest, fittest, or smartest. For sure, they both are dead, are they not?
Does being strong and fit not require sense-enough to get there, and does sense-enough to stay alive not require, well, some sense? How many fools do we hear about dying every day from absolutley stupid decisions that they made?
Gotta be smart out chea on deze skreets, right? What if you're not? What if you drag a man down the street because he's black?
My analogy was to justify this execution. Killing others unjustly is not an ethical issue, it is a moral one, and it is a cornerstone of humanity's successful domination of the food chain: We cannot live like we do by going around and slaughtering each other willy nilly. (WHEN we do, it is called war, and reasons for war are often times unjust, but the soldiers carrying out their duty are not.) Much like if you breath in water like a fish, if you kill me unjustly, you're breaking a natural law that will get you killed, or at a minimum, get you put away where you'll die inside of yourself by losing your freedom and dignity and humanity.
Just like the fools who die from falling off the edge of the biggest hole in the ground on planet earth, just like the idiot who was mauled to death by a wild hippo that he got idiotically close to in an attempt for an "epic" selfie, the idiot who slaughtered this man is dead because of HIS OWN act of foolishness. He chose his destiny- just like the guy outrunning the train did- and today he paid the Piper.
Today, he is as dead as the jackass in that hippo's mouth was, and it is only natural that it is so.
You might not agree with my opinion on it (perhaps because you don't agree with CP and that's okay because I'm no staunch proponent of it either), but what's not to get?
Because as-is, your analogy is not making one iota's worth of sense to me.
This post was edited on 4/25/19 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 4/25/19 at 12:48 pm to GarnetStrand
quote:
If your argument is natural selection then reason dictates every white man in here has to support this guy's actions.
What?!?!?!?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)