Bigbee Hills

quote:

---

Get your shite together. You're the Lib here.

---

you're goddamned right i am. i'm the liberal your cuck father always wanted you to be.

the problem isn't with classical liberals, as the majority of individuals on the board are far more likely to be liberal (or libertarian by today's standards) than your filthy arse is, the problem is people like yourself calling yourselves "liberals" and the pop culture media doing a disservice to liberalism and libertarianism by calling leftist filth like yourself, "liberals" when you're nothing of the sort.

a leftist is as much a liberal as a conservative is. i've got my shite together, but from what i've read on this thread, you and your "enemies" who love the "police" part of the police state ought to get your's together, as you're all very very confused on what to do and think (like the sheeple you are) when the police state is called into a private institution to whip the shite out of a private citizen for a goddamned loincloth over the face.

there's no upside to a police state, you leftist trash, but congrats on getting your 3 upvotes by the 3 knee jerk, "cOnSeRvAtIvEs" on a board full of individuals who don't suck off the state like you and your ilk do.

my shite is as together as a goddamned encyclopedia you rioting, "muh tax the rich" trash.

double post

quote:

---

So, this story has completely wiped out your comply to the blue line theory in a single stroke. What a hill to die on, but it's your hill.

---

i don't know about the guy who you're referring to, but for me personally the whole "comply or die" and "back the blue (unequivocally and without question)" was a farce to begin with, and it only gained traction in the "muh small government" crowd when you and your filth started burning down cities and businesses in a fit of rage because a crackhead died of an overdose but just happened to have a cop's knee on his kneck when he did.

in the end the objective has been achieved: get the people to agree with the politician's mouthpiece (i.e., the police) when they beat an elderly woman senseless over a loincloth mask to agree with their methods and to agree blindly and without question all because leftist trash threw a hissy fit
in the summer and killed people and caused billions in damage over a crackhead. of course, people like yourself who want more politicians in your life will laugh and scoff at them, but you also agree with the state sanctioned arse whipping because of "muh masks" and are in as much of a conundrum as the "other side."

y'all leftists love you some state sanctioned mandates and hate the governors who gave some individual freedoms back. in the end the politicians win because all the sheeple, left and right, are on their side: the right unequivocally loves them some police, and the left unequivocally loves them some state, and in the end you've all got your police state.

and yeah, that's exactly what the bank had in mind when they called the government police, i'm sure of it.

the easy answer to all of this is that it is wrong for an agent of the government to beat an elderly woman to within an inch of her life all for some political ideology (i. e., masks) that leftist like yourself so much adore, and for the, "muh small government" individuals it's a conundrum when it doesn't have to be: it's never a noble thing when a private institution calls in the government to beat a citizen to near death over a lie (i.e., masks) unless it's leftist filth like yourself -state power makes your little soy cocks hard as a diamond.

but yeah, like i said: i'm sure what the government agents gave her is EXACTLY what the bank had in mind. some people are about to get the f*ck sued out of them and rightfully so. that's an abuse of power.

it was wrong for the government and the institution to do that. as long as we have the constitution, her individual rights trump the state's power and the rights of that institution every time. it was wrong for them to do it THAT way. PERIOD.

even state loving filth like you should be able to admit that, in private of course, while the feeble "conservatives" can admit their "blue lives matter (no matter WHAT) (merica, FRICK YEAH)" bullshite was a fallacy, in private of course.

there's no upside to a police state.

there's no upside to a police state.

there's no upside to a police state.

there's no upside to a police state.

quote:

---

cringe

---

i don't think i've ever posted over there, and i don't intend to now. besides, i don't have time to live at this place like you do.

that said, the only thing "cringe" about this whole thread is you and the other soft arse filth like yourself who don't want it talked about when it's brought up.

what exactly is, "it"?

"it" is this clown show of a presidential administration that you voted for.

stop being lead around like a helpless blind dog by your beloved molester president and own up to the fact that YOUR vote for biden helped create this crisis. i didn't do a goddamned thing except reply to a thread with truth, and since that hurts your little pussy, all you (and others like you) have to say is, "muuh, take it to the pt." frick the pt and frick your feelings.

quote:

---

I bought my son a 1996 F150 Single Cab Short bed 4x4 with a manual transmission, because like you I didn't want him driving a lot of people around. I also wanted his hands to be to busy to be on his phone, and I didn't want him to let his friends drive it "figured the stick would solve this problem".

---

yessir. my son isn't even two yet but i've got this ol beater single cab 4wd tacoma standard transmission that i plan on putting him in for his first truck. it runs great right now, but i plan on restoring the body and keeping it under cover and using it sparingly to keep it running good. there's no doubt in my mind it'll last another 20k miles/ 15 years until he's ready to try his hand at driving, even in

in that truck he can't go too fast, can't haul around a pile of buddies and can't totally disregard the road due to the standard transmission. out the 4 vehicles i own, 2 are standard, and at one time even my wife's car was a standard. i bought a new dodge 3500 cab and chassis this year with the hd aisin automatic transmission in it, and even though it stops 30,000 lbs better than my older rigs, the automatic transmission in trucks are still inferior when compared to an experienced operator towing an extremely heavy load with a standard transmission. there's no comparison, really.

a standard transmission makes you an actual operator of the machine instead of a being a "driver" of the machine. a standard shift transmission makes you a better, more aware driver by default, and even though it becomes 2nd nature, it still takes skill and attentiveness - a good combination for a new, immature youngin' who's full of piss and vinegar.

quote:

---

To be fair, less than the size of a dime worth of powder is enough to kill someone with some of these fent's they're making overseas, in all honesty. Not to mention they cut heroin with it, making both even more likely to metabolize stronger. It is definitely a major issue.

---

for who?

train dogs and have pretty much most of my adult life.

your dog needs exercise. dogs who do this type of stuff need stimulation. 99% of the time this is the case.

but for us first world 21st century humans, that's the hard part: taking time to take care of our animals.

newsflash: owning a living breathing animal that has wants and desires and that conforms to our rules and decrees takes work, but work is hard and time is all of a sudden more precious nowadays.

exercise your dog, or make it everyone else's problem when she goes to the shelter. it's up to you AND your wife. the fix is simple but it takes effort, and the fault is only on that of the owner for not taking up the responsibility of the task.

quote:

---

Meauxjeaux

---

you oughtta be ashamed of your goddamned self for even asking such basic baw shite.

A S H A M E D .

"Bangkok's Nasty Politics"

another pulitzer prize winning photograph. i hope the mods don't dr. seuss me/it

quote:

---

Exactly four decades after his iconic photograph of the Oct 6, 1976, Thammasat massacre, Neal Ulevich reflects on the circumstances of history captured through the lens

---

quote:

---

The photograph is brutal because the reality is brutal.

---

quote:

---

As memories fade and truth remains clouded, a particular photo has grown in implication, in reflection and in sheer horror. There's a lot of photographs and news footage from the morning of Oct 6, 1976, when the police and right-wing militia laid siege and attacked students at Thammasat University, killing and brutalising scores in one of the worst bloodsheds in Thailand's modern history. But it's the one image taken by AP photographer Neal Ulevich that encapsulates the senseless brutality, and the madness, of that morning 40 years ago: a mutilated corpse dangling from a tree in Sanam Luang as a man is about to bash the lifeless body with a folding chair. The photograph, even more chilling to some, also shows a boy standing among the onlookers laughing.
The importance of Ulevich's picture as a historical record is immense, becoming even more so over the decades as society has gone through other clashes of ideologies, leaving more dead bodies on the street. Today the "chair" photograph is invariably used to exemplify the worst outcome of a conflict spiralling out of control after nationalistic propaganda plants fear and hatred of political enemies. (In 1976 it was the communists.) The eerie power of the picture has also evolved over the past 40 years: it was used as an album cover of an American rock band (Ulevich didn't realise it until he saw it); it inspired several Thai theatre productions and movies; and has been used in countless satirical internet memes. The word kao-ee, or "chair" -- referring to the chair in the photo -- has also acquired a jokey, colloquial connotation in certain circles in Thailand, meaning a threat to those who have anti-establishment thoughts.

---

https://www.bangkokpost.com/life/arts-and-entertainment/1098817/in-the-eye-of-the-storm