Started By
Message

re: Victim shaming not habit evidence in Gruver case

Posted on 4/12/19 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by Cump11b
Member since Sep 2018
2026 posts
Posted on 4/12/19 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

It is relevant because there were 20+ other kids also being hazed that night and only one of them died.


That's not relevant when they are trying to prove that Max was singled out

quote:

They will say that the hazing was the vehicle that killed him but that Gruver was driving that vehicle, not the Hazers.


If he was high when he showed up for the "hazing, you could argue that he was not of sound mind to make proper decisions, therefore putting responsibility on the hazer
Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
16549 posts
Posted on 4/12/19 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

If he was high when he showed up for the "hazing, you could argue that he was not of sound mind to make proper decisions, therefore putting responsibility on the hazer


I can't recall, but was he already drunk when he showed up? That would hinder my decision making ability more than smoking weed
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram