- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Skeptic or Not, Can we agree on the meeting?
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:34 pm to OchoDedos
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:34 pm to OchoDedos
You think he judge is going to let in testimony if a federal case to "muddy the waters" when his testimony is not relevant to whether these defendants committed a crime?
It doesn't matter who helps, he can only testify if the judge finds his testimony relevant to issues at trial. Which it is not.
It doesn't matter who helps, he can only testify if the judge finds his testimony relevant to issues at trial. Which it is not.
1
Posted on 3/19/19 at 6:42 pm to ellessuuuu
Like I said, Dawkins defense team may believe they have something on Wade that the Fed's dont know about. I agree the transcript is hearsay, and doesnt prove anything, other than Wade has a big mouth.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News