- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Flawed analysis, failed oversight: How Boeing, FAA certified the suspect 737 MAX
Posted on 3/19/19 at 9:25 am to Man4others
Posted on 3/19/19 at 9:25 am to Man4others
quote:
The planes engines are “too powerful” forcing the plane to climb too rapidly.
Okay. So was there any indication in the initial flight test that pointed to this flaw? Pilot inexperience you say? What about the pilots on the first crash? Were they as inexperienced as the pilots in this last crash? It was reported at least one American pilot severly critcized the flight manual for this airplane. Said it was incomplete and confusing. Obviously the FAA approved the flight manual for this airplane.
Lots of questions. But I know one thing Congress better stop this obsessive-compulsive chasing after Donald Trump and start finding some answers regarding the b/s over at the FAA. But then given the obsession with political correctness evident in Washington we may damn well never know where the failure occurred.
This post was edited on 3/19/19 at 9:27 am
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News