- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New Mexico National Popular Vote Bill Headed to Governer's Desk
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:31 pm to upgrayedd
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:31 pm to upgrayedd
Wyoming has less than a million people living there.
New your has over 19 million people.
Each vote represents 673,869 people roughly
wyoming has 577,737 people living there.
Every electoral vote for New York represents more people than live in the entire state of Wyoming.
And then Wyoming gets 2 more votes.
How is that equal representation? They’re getting over 3xs the representations. That’s basic math.
This same arguement was had when our forefathers were deciding on how the legislature would be decided, and they just went with the bicameral house.
The EC splits the baby, but why? And should it?
Some other extreme exacmoles
Montana has almost double Wyoming’s populations and the same # of votes.
New your has over 19 million people.
Each vote represents 673,869 people roughly
wyoming has 577,737 people living there.
Every electoral vote for New York represents more people than live in the entire state of Wyoming.
And then Wyoming gets 2 more votes.
How is that equal representation? They’re getting over 3xs the representations. That’s basic math.
This same arguement was had when our forefathers were deciding on how the legislature would be decided, and they just went with the bicameral house.
The EC splits the baby, but why? And should it?
Some other extreme exacmoles
Montana has almost double Wyoming’s populations and the same # of votes.
This post was edited on 3/13/19 at 5:42 pm
3
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:43 pm to SammyTiger
WY has three because it's the minimum amount of EC you can possibly have. If you think that means that WY has more power than NY then I don't know what to tell you.
Do you think WY should only have one Senator in addition to their 1 representative?
Do you think WY should only have one Senator in addition to their 1 representative?
Posted on 3/13/19 at 5:43 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Every electoral vote for New York represents more people than live in the entire state of Wyoming.
And then Wyoming gets 2 more votes.
How is that equal representation? They’re getting over 3xs the representations.
So what. What a retarded argument. There is nothing stopping leftist Marxists from moving to Wyoming and make their vote count more in the EC.
The Constitution would have never been ratified without the EC. Do away with the EC, you do away with the republic.
Posted on 3/14/19 at 7:51 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Wyoming has less than a million people living there.
New your has over 19 million people.
Each vote represents 673,869 people roughly
wyoming has 577,737 people living there.
Every electoral vote for New York represents more people than live in the entire state of Wyoming.
And then Wyoming gets 2 more votes.
How is that equal representation? They’re getting over 3xs the representations. That’s basic math.
This same arguement was had when our forefathers were deciding on how the legislature would be decided, and they just went with the bicameral house.
The EC splits the baby, but why? And should it?
Some other extreme exacmoles
Montana has almost double Wyoming’s populations and the same # of votes.
Do you know or understand why the Senate exists?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News