- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Actual Indictment of Dawkins and Gatto read this before posting another word
Posted on 3/10/19 at 7:37 pm to uftiger
Posted on 3/10/19 at 7:37 pm to uftiger
quote:
Indictments are not facts; instead they comprise allegations of facts, as well as the government (grand jury) opinion of the law. They are not authoritative, which is why we have judges and trials and opportunities for appeal.
I qualified with "facts as seen by prosecutors", my statement of "providing facts" was more to the point that this is the "actually indictment" not my interpretation, my writing is obviously not up to legal scrutiny. But, I give up, most here are not going to read indictment, they will keep believing whatever makes them feel better.
1
Posted on 3/10/19 at 8:07 pm to EA6B
quote:
I qualified with "facts as seen by prosecutors", my statement of "providing facts" was more to the point that this is the "actually indictment" not my interpretation, my writing is obviously not up to legal scrutiny.
Ok, but you posted the “qualification” 61 minutes after your initial post, and long after several “unqualified” statements. You also posted it 1 minute before my criticism; thus, I was writing and did not see it.
Still, you did not clarify that legal analysis in an indictment is just an opinion, as well.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News