Started By
Message
locked post

Tim Kaine Suggests He’ll Oppose Ban on Infanticide

Posted on 2/22/19 at 3:58 am
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 3:58 am
LINK

The proverbial cat is out the bag as they say... wtf is going on? The Democrats have literally gone bat shite crazy.

quote:

Senator Tim Kaine is in a bind. The Virginia Democrat has been confronted in recent weeks about where exactly he stands on abortion rights, and he’s learning that there’s no easy way to make everyone happy.

His latest juggling act is finding a way to pacify concerned Catholic constituents, who wish to know where their Catholic senator stands on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, a proposed piece of federal legislation that would mandate medical care for infants born alive in the context of abortion.

Senator Ben Sasse (R., Neb.) brought the bill to the floor earlier this month, in the wake of Virginia governor Ralph Northam’s comments appearing to endorse physicians’ right to let newborns die, at least in some circumstances. The entire Senate will vote on the legislation on Monday.

Though Kaine has yet to issue a statement on how he plans to vote, he recently responded to constituent inquiries about his stance on the bill with a letter, a copy of which was obtained by National Review. The text doesn’t say explicitly whether he’ll vote against Sasse’s bill next week, but the implication seems to be that he intends to oppose it.

“This bill would establish new requirements for health care practitioners in the case of a fetus who survives an abortion,” Kaine writes. It’s an intriguing turn of phrase: A fetus, after all, is what the Left has chosen to call unborn children in an effort to dehumanize them. If a fetus survives an abortion, presumably it is no longer a fetus but a newborn infant

The rest of the letter is similarly slippery. “I support the right of women to make their own health and reproductive decisions,” Kaine goes on. “For that reason, I oppose efforts to weaken the basic holding of Roe v. Wade . . . [and oppose] restricting and criminalizing women’s reproductive decisions.”

This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 4:07 am
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7858 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:05 am to
quote:

“I support the right of women to make their own health and reproductive decisions,” Kaine goes on. “For that reason, I oppose efforts to weaken the basic holding of Roe v. Wade . . . [and oppose] restricting and criminalizing women’s reproductive decisions.”

It goes without saying, that no matter your stance on abortion, a woman's health is no longer in ANY way an issue once the baby is born.

Jeez, Kaine... even Sheila Jackson Lee probably knows that! (but she'd keep it to herself)
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:08 am to
They want to kill babies that even out the woman’s body. I thought Gov Northam actually misspoke but it’s clear these sick fricks think they can kill any baby before they leave the hospital.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80161 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:16 am to
quote:

establish new requirements for health care practitioners


Anyone who supports Obamacare certainly has no principled opposition to this.
Posted by JPinLondon
not in London (currently NW Ohio)
Member since Nov 2006
7858 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:20 am to
quote:

Anyone who supports Obamacare certainly has no principled opposition to this.

good point. A Dem lamenting government involvement. Unicorn, perhaps?
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 4:49 am to




“He expertly exonerates President Trump and his supporters, then uncovers the Democratic Left’s long, cozy relationship with Nazism: how the racist and genocidal acts of early Democrats inspired Adolf Hitler’s campaign of death; how fascist philosophers influenced the great 20th century lions of the American Left; and how today’s anti-free speech, anti-capitalist, anti-religious liberty, pro-violence Democratic Party is a frightening simulacrum of the Nazi Party.”
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 4:54 am
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
68474 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 5:47 am to
Wtodd "suggests" that Tim Kaine is POS
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92711 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:21 am to
quote:

I thought Gov Northam actually misspoke but it’s clear these sick fricks think they can kill any baby before they leave the hospital.


Kaine might have to face the music in this case. Surely VA voters are a bit smarter than to not read past his word salad
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12441 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:26 am to
Awful. I can't see the DNC winning elections if that is the position they take. If they do win elections with that position, then God help us all.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:27 am to
quote:

Ban on Infanticide
A child is born with a condition incompatible with life outside the womb.

One side says that the child should be provided palliative care and allowed to die quietly and comfortably on day one

The other side says that the child should be subjected to seven days of extensive and invasive medical procedures, all so that it can die on day seven ... rather than day one.

One side says that the parents should be able to choose between the two options. The other side says that the government should mandate the latter course for them.

And the latter also call themselves “Small government conservatives.”
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 7:35 am
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:37 am to
Wish there was a way to block posters. I support your right to type your opinions, just that I do not care about them.

You are a contrarian and predictable. Keep pissing into the wind, then claiming that evaporation due to prevailing winds will keep you dry.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36471 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:39 am to
So playing along with your straw man (which isn’t the only situation the bill is under) you are ok with the attempted murderer being the one who pulls the plug when they couldn’t finish the job?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:41 am to
quote:

A child is born with a condition incompatible with life outside the womb.

One side says that the child should be provided palliative care and allowed to die quietly and comfortably on day one

The other side says that the child should be subjected to seven days of extensive and invasive medical procedures, all so that it can die on day seven ... rather than day one.

One side says that the parents should be able to choose between the two options. The other side says that the government should mandate the latter course for them.

And the latter also call themselves “Small government conservatives.”


frick you

Explain Vermont a-hole. That is the fricking endgame.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:41 am to
quote:

They want to kill babies


That still isn't happening. When you say things like this it makes you look ignorant and it weakens your position, which I partially agree with.

Do better.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93715 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:43 am to
quote:

That still isn't happening


Its happening daily but you know that
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Its happening daily but you know that


No it isn't. Killing babies is still illegal.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93715 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:47 am to
quote:

No it isn't.


Yes it is and you know it
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
57099 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:47 am to
quote:

A child is born with a condition incompatible with life outside the womb. One side says that the child should be provided palliative care and allowed to die quietly and comfortably on day one The other side says that the child should be subjected to seven days of extensive and invasive medical procedures, all so that it can die on day seven ... rather than day one. One side says that the parents should be able to choose between the two options. The other side says that the government should mandate the latter course for them. And the latter also call themselves “Small government conservatives.”

well, when you bring up such a common occurrence. What condition are you speaking about and when did your scenario occur, specifically?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:48 am to
quote:

Yes it is and you know it


No it isn't. Killing babies is still illegal.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93715 posts
Posted on 2/22/19 at 7:53 am to
quote:

No it isn't. Killing babies is still illegal.


No it's not stop lying like always
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram