- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
4
Posted on 2/11/19 at 1:01 pm to bamarep
quote:
It blows my mind that this is even a debate.
Same here. There's literally no reason why a fetus at 28 weeks and up can't be delivered alive and survive if removing the child is necessary to save the mother.
To say late term abortions are needed in cases where the mother's life is in danger is a scientifically ignorant statement.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 1:21 pm to bamarep
quote:
It blows my mind that this is even a debate.
Actually it isn't....
Posted on 2/11/19 at 1:38 pm to bamarep
Yeah, it’s called deliver the baby if mom’s in trouble. Might spend a few weeks in NICU, but the baby will be fine, and if there was any danger like Preclampsia, etc. well then, so is the Mom. I don’t know how anyone does not know this???????
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 2/11/19 at 2:18 pm to bamarep
They can't be honest and say they don't want the inconvenience of raising a child.
Maybe I should be a cold eugenicist like a horse or dog breeder and just hope that stupid, selfish women that can't be inconvenienced are slowly eliminating the stupid selfish gene from the gene pool.
Maybe I should be a cold eugenicist like a horse or dog breeder and just hope that stupid, selfish women that can't be inconvenienced are slowly eliminating the stupid selfish gene from the gene pool.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News