- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: A Scientific dissent from Darwin
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:10 am to narddogg81
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:10 am to narddogg81
quote:
Actually, the discrepancy in the fossil record is the reason traditional Darwinism had to be abandoned.
Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.
ID is just masked creationism. It can never compete in the scientific community.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:15 am to Kentucker
quote:Non-scientific types think that continued refinement is 100% refutation.
Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.
quote:Honestly, I don't see any conflict between ID and evolution.
ID is just masked creationism. It can never compete in the scientific community.
If some all powerful being decided to create the universe knowing exactly how to set the system up such that it gave rise to what we see today and did it through the mechanisms we've just begun to study, that's pretty fricking impressive.
Frankly, I've never seen any conflict between Evolution and God at all. Scientists who think Evolution eliminates God are as silly as the RobbBobb's of the world.
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:49 am to Kentucker
quote:its been refined by completely flipping the original premise that species originate gradually from one version of the animal to another, predicting thousands or millions of intermediate versions of the animal, until it has become a different animal. This was accepted as fact by the entire scientific world in complete confidence that it would be validated asmore examples we unearthed, except that didn't happen. So then they adanded basically the entire original premise and say it happens almost instantly, so fast that it can't be captured in the fossil record, through incalculable numbers of advantageous mutations (which are vanishingly rare), happening not just in one species but in every single one that we see explode in just a few million years. And that extremely unlikely series of events has happened not once but dozens of times we know about. I'm not sure why you don't see the problem with that. The math just didn't add up. Thinking about this kind of stuff is what science should be doing. The should be no sacred cows
Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 12:09 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News