Started By
Message

re: A Scientific dissent from Darwin

Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:10 am to
Posted by Kentucker
Cincinnati, KY
Member since Apr 2013
19351 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Actually, the discrepancy in the fossil record is the reason traditional Darwinism had to be abandoned.


Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.

ID is just masked creationism. It can never compete in the scientific community.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.

Non-scientific types think that continued refinement is 100% refutation.

quote:

ID is just masked creationism. It can never compete in the scientific community.

Honestly, I don't see any conflict between ID and evolution.

If some all powerful being decided to create the universe knowing exactly how to set the system up such that it gave rise to what we see today and did it through the mechanisms we've just begun to study, that's pretty fricking impressive.

Frankly, I've never seen any conflict between Evolution and God at all. Scientists who think Evolution eliminates God are as silly as the RobbBobb's of the world.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
20380 posts
Posted on 2/11/19 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Final response. Darwinism hasn’t been abandoned. It’s been refined.
its been refined by completely flipping the original premise that species originate gradually from one version of the animal to another, predicting thousands or millions of intermediate versions of the animal, until it has become a different animal. This was accepted as fact by the entire scientific world in complete confidence that it would be validated asmore examples we unearthed, except that didn't happen. So then they adanded basically the entire original premise and say it happens almost instantly, so fast that it can't be captured in the fossil record, through incalculable numbers of advantageous mutations (which are vanishingly rare), happening not just in one species but in every single one that we see explode in just a few million years. And that extremely unlikely series of events has happened not once but dozens of times we know about. I'm not sure why you don't see the problem with that. The math just didn't add up. Thinking about this kind of stuff is what science should be doing. The should be no sacred cows
This post was edited on 2/11/19 at 12:09 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram