Started By
Message

re: WAPO reporting Nathan Phillips did not fight in vietnam war, which was claimed prior

Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

It will destroy you to admit that you were wrong. And you were.


quote:

Did he claim he was a Vietnam vet or that he was in during the Vietnam War?


This was what I asked. How that has a right or wrong to it is beyond me. Maybe you can explain.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112924 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:31 pm to
There is a link on page two which you continue to ignore.


For the sake of argument - let's just assume he said Vietnam era veteran. a.) Why would he not correct all of these politicians and media heads who are claiming he was a Vietnam Veteran?

b.) If he didn't want to be associated with Vietnam, why include that in his description?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141569 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:31 pm to
Your continued defense of the liar is also wrong.

Just admit that you are on the wrong side of history on this. You progs love that saying. Lol
Posted by ShreveportHog94
GodBlessAmerica
Member since Nov 2006
6036 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

o people were claiming him as a Vietnam veteran bc he was in the Marines in '72 is what I'm gathering. I'm just waiting to see any links of him claiming he was a war vet or stolen valor. Was he in fact in the Marines in 72? That's what I'm seeing but no confirmation.


I then asked for links to confirm and got them. Then gave my response and said Phillips is wrong to not correct the record.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram