Started By
Message

re: Privatizing public hunting land

Posted on 1/16/19 at 4:26 pm to
Posted by Mr Wonderful
Love City
Member since Oct 2015
1045 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

You said you don't hunt WMAs, so how is it that you understand the condition of them so well?

Way to deflect. So you admit that WMAs (for the most part) are poorly managed because they are run by a broke government?
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12746 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

So you admit that WMAs (for the most part) are poorly managed because they are run by a broke government?

No, I'm just questioning how someone who claims to not hunt WMAs knows about the condition of them. I've hunted WMAs that aren't that great, and other ones that are really great hunting.

I'm just trying to establish your true level of knowledge here so I can determime whether you are just another waste of words or not.
Posted by InfamousDosgris
Gonzales, LA
Member since Jan 2019
147 posts
Posted on 1/16/19 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

public land is better managed than private land?


You forgot to mention all the projects DU does on the WMAs for ducks. Also, WMAs are managed to support hundreds of hunters making over thousands of hunts per year. If you ask me, I can name several WMAs off the top of my head that produce good numbers of large deer as well as other WMAs better known for duck hunting. Lets not forget all the work LDWF did at Jackson-Bienville for the Turkey population and it became known as the best WMA in the state for turkey hunting if not one of the better places in the state, private land included. Your arguments are invalid and no so "wonderful"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram