Started By
Message

re: Why Is Africa Continent Still Full Of “Developing Countries “?

Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:06 pm to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36546 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:06 pm to
Relying on IQ in historical discussions isn't a reliable metric. Firstly, nutrition levels seemingly declined after the neolithic revolution, where groups of people decreased in height and weight. Nutrition levels determine quite a bit of IQ, up to one standard deviation. One meta-study of 37000 Chinese children showed an IQ difference of 15 points based on the addition of iodine alone, which is a massive swing. Given the inconsistent levels of nutrition in the ancient world, our notion of IQ isn't necessarily applicable to those civilizations. Secondly, African civilizations on river valleys in East Africa were as highly developed as European ones until antiquity. Things like centralization efforts, trade routes, and availability of domesticated plants and animals are much more predicative of the success of ancient civilizations than something as nebulous as "intelligence."
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112752 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:33 pm to
Then go back to Ice people Sun people. That's why white people had to become more violent. Like this white guy:

Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162289 posts
Posted on 1/11/19 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Nutrition levels determine quite a bit of IQ, up to one standard deviation

Right. IQ matters but a lot of the countries with lower IQ are likely battling nutritional issues. Then you have the issue of epigenetic inheritance to factor in as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram