- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Clemson officially a CFB new blood?
Posted on 1/8/19 at 12:54 pm to karmew32
Posted on 1/8/19 at 12:54 pm to karmew32
I have always found this argument interesting. What do you do with schools like Minnesota? Minnesota has 7 claimed national titles!!
679 Wins
7 National Titles - 1904', 34', 35', 36', 40', 41', 60'
18 Conference Titles
1 Heisman
33 All Americans
By Comparison with LSU:
791 Wins
3 National Titles - 1958', 03', 07'
15 Conference Titles
1 Heisman
35 All Americans
By these standards, these two schools belong in the same category. Minnesota is one of the most overlooked schools in the history of college football when you take everything into consideration.
679 Wins
7 National Titles - 1904', 34', 35', 36', 40', 41', 60'
18 Conference Titles
1 Heisman
33 All Americans
By Comparison with LSU:
791 Wins
3 National Titles - 1958', 03', 07'
15 Conference Titles
1 Heisman
35 All Americans
By these standards, these two schools belong in the same category. Minnesota is one of the most overlooked schools in the history of college football when you take everything into consideration.
Posted on 1/8/19 at 1:39 pm to Buckeye Backer
That is true. Blue Blood program evaluation must encompass the entire history of college football. I would do a ranking based on wins, win percentage, conference titles national titles, and players produced--award winners, All-Americans, etc for the 150 year history of college football. That's the most objective way to do it.
Posted on 1/8/19 at 2:14 pm to Buckeye Backer
Kudos to Wikipedia, it looks like Minnesota football didn’t play in a bowl game until 1960 (lost). Prior to that the conference or school elected to not play in bowl games.
And there’s your worthless piece of sports trivia!
And there’s your worthless piece of sports trivia!
Posted on 1/8/19 at 10:59 pm to Buckeye Backer
Minnesota is nothing more than Big Ten Ole Miss (reasons being opposite side of the same coin).
Posted on 1/9/19 at 9:49 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
What do you do with schools like Minnesota? Minnesota has 7 claimed national titles!!
It's been too long to hold relevance for those titles though. And the mediocrity has been so consistent, you can't give them the Michigan treatment.
Posted on 1/9/19 at 10:46 am to Buckeye Backer
quote:
Minnesota is one of the most overlooked schools in the history of college football when you take everything into consideration.
I tend to agree, but they're overlooked because everyone that was around for the claimed National Championships is dead. Minnesota has, largely, been irrelevant for near 60 years. They haven't won a Big Ten Championship or been to a Rose Bowl since 1961.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News