Started By
Message

re: New Glocks: G48 and G43x

Posted on 1/3/19 at 7:23 am to
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11913 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 7:23 am to
It’s not about enjoyment . It’s a question of practicality. Do you want the rear aperture snapping off on something?

I don’t think the U-Dot sight style is all that bad but the fact that they are plastic leaves much to be desired. I’d say that for any handgun with plastic sights. Sights are an essential part of the handgun.
Posted by doliss
Northern VA
Member since Sep 2009
989 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:34 am to
quote:

It’s a question of practicality. Do you want the rear aperture snapping off on something?


Switched the sights on my carry glocks for this reason, otherwise the factory sights are fine for range shooting
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Sights are an essential part of the handgun.


Sure. At the range. When SHTF not many people are lining up sights trying to snipe bad guys with a handgun. Cheap factory sights are fine for working on stance and grip to create that muscle memory needed for instinctive shooting out to about 15-20 yards
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 10:38 am to
I've had the OEM plastic sights on mine for 6 years and I haven't had any issues. Granted I'm not doing all the tactical racking off my belt very much either, but they've suited me just fine. Front site post has some burrs on it from holster wear but it doesn't affect my accuracy.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram