- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Challenge rules need to be changed
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:22 pm to 1609tiger
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:22 pm to 1609tiger
Or perhaps a tiered approach. You should only lose challenges if the call on the field is confirmed. If it is overturned, you have one more challenge. Both of those like it is now. But if a call stands, you shouldn’t be penalized either. You shouldn’t be punished if there aren’t any good camera angles or if it was too close to confirm.
1
Posted on 11/30/18 at 12:31 pm to Indigold
quote:
Or perhaps a tiered approach. You should only lose challenges if the call on the field is confirmed. If it is overturned, you have one more challenge. Both of those like it is now. But if a call stands, you shouldn’t be penalized either. You shouldn’t be punished if there aren’t any good camera angles or if it was too close to confirm.
Not sure if they would be the best idea. There would be WAY too many challenges if you aren't punished if a play stands rather than being confirmed. I've always liked the idea of having 2 challenges that you can get wrong, like other posters have already mentioned.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News