- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Federal Judge rules on child Genital Mutilation. You won't like it
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:34 am to Jjdoc
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:34 am to Jjdoc
After reading the judge’s opinion in the article, I completely see where he is coming from.
He’s also the kind of fricktard that makes the rest of us laugh at libertarians. He has decided that somehow, there will be enough behind the support of his reinterpretation of the commerce clause to back his opinion up at the SCOTUS level.
Is it textual? Sure. Thanks to precedent though, a textual reading of the commerce clause is a reinterpretation.
This is going to get overturned on appeal and I think we all know that. The judiciary is not going to scrap 4/5ths of the federal government because of one libertarian judge.
He’s also the kind of fricktard that makes the rest of us laugh at libertarians. He has decided that somehow, there will be enough behind the support of his reinterpretation of the commerce clause to back his opinion up at the SCOTUS level.
Is it textual? Sure. Thanks to precedent though, a textual reading of the commerce clause is a reinterpretation.
This is going to get overturned on appeal and I think we all know that. The judiciary is not going to scrap 4/5ths of the federal government because of one libertarian judge.
2
Posted on 11/21/18 at 12:56 am to cokebottleag
There's always still a BS allusion to the commerce clause when they justify these federal laws though. They always find a strange way to connect it to that, but in this case what would the argument that connects this to the commerce clause be?
Posted on 11/21/18 at 5:38 am to cokebottleag
quote:
This is going to get overturned on appeal and I think we all know that. The judiciary is not going to scrap 4/5ths of the federal government because of one libertarian judge.
basically
this is the libertarian equivalent of "at least it started a conversation"
you have to imagine he could have chosen a better case to make this point, though
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News