Started By
Message

re: 3rd CWD Case in Mississippi

Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:00 am to
Posted by LSU Neil
Springfield
Member since Feb 2007
2515 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:00 am to
So it says “voluntary sample”. Wonder if the hunter simply wanted to test his/her deer? Or did it give reason to warrant testing? (Was the deer showing signs)
Just curious, bc if everyone got their deer tested, what would we find- OR
How happy would you be that a CWD was processed where yours was and contaminated all the deer that were processed there. (Which is a scary as hell thought)
Posted by crankbait
Member since Feb 2008
11623 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 8:14 am to
it really should become mandatory within a certain range where CWD has been identified. No way to remotely know what is going on without that. If it is not mandatory, it will get out of control until it is too late.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81726 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:24 am to
quote:

So it says “voluntary sample”. Wonder if the hunter simply wanted to test his/her deer? Or did it give reason to warrant testing? (Was the deer showing signs)
Just curious,
Lots of clubs are doing this as a club policy.
Posted by beHop
Landmass
Member since Jan 2012
14538 posts
Posted on 11/12/18 at 9:28 am to
quote:

Was the deer showing signs


There could be twenty deer standing in a field, 15 of them infected, and you wouldn't be able to tell. The only time you can assume they may have it is when they're literally at death's doorstep. This, in my opinion, is what makes it so scary. I can't just go out and identify the infected ones to remove. Otherwise, this thing would be stopped in its tracks.
This post was edited on 11/12/18 at 9:29 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram