- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are federal and gubernatorial elections not subject to a set of standardized rules?
Posted on 11/9/18 at 5:30 pm to Bass Tiger
Posted on 11/9/18 at 5:30 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:You hate states rights. Got it.
Why are federal and gubernatorial elections not subject to a set of standardized rules?
I've asked this question for 15-20 years, nothing changes and we're still dealing with the same old BS election after election. We have plenty of national laws and standards but voting is still left to a buncha political hacks at the state and local level. Broward Co FL in 2000 should have been the end of Dim voter fraud.
If Congress was doing it's job to preserve the integrity of our electoral process standardized election laws would have been law 20 years ago but for some reason there's a shite load of people who don't want things to change and for the life of me I can't figure it out, does anyone know why.
1
Posted on 11/9/18 at 6:00 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
You hate states rights. Got it.
This is the weakest Dim argument against standardized election laws for federal and gubernatorial candidates. The states are smothered with federal laws that they can’t do shite about at least passing legislation to restore the integrity to our federal and gubernatorial elections would mitigate most of the BS we’re witnessing today.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News