Started By
Message

re: 104th in offense is on the coaches

Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:40 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279519 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:40 pm to
I don’t think Ensminger is the problem. That is just low hanging fruit for people who hated the hire to begin with.

There hasn’t been a team in college football that has had to deal with the line issues we have had. Lack of execution by the WRs has been another huge problem.

On top of that we replaced basically the whole offense, player for player, from last year. Our QB was a late add this summer, too.


In a vacuum the play calling has not been terrible. It just hasn’t.
This post was edited on 11/5/18 at 12:42 pm
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35633 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

In a vacuum the play calling has not been terrible. It just hasn’t.

I mean, fair enough, but is your explanation for such a low ranking offense the fact that we have new players on offense? Does that justify a 104th ranking?

And wouldn't execution of WRs be helped with a better offensive coach?

Are you saying we couldn't bring anyone in to improve that number at all?

And I have to tell you, if recruiting is the problem, I'm even more concerned. O has recruited the last 3 classes.
Posted by Rickdaddy4188
Murfreesboro,TN
Member since Aug 2011
46652 posts
Posted on 11/5/18 at 11:19 pm to
quote:


In a vacuum the play calling has not been terrible. It just hasn’t


There is nothing to support this besides your proven biased opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram