Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Conference has the option to bring replay of a targeting call to a national coordinator

Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:05 pm
Posted by Geauxtigersfootball
Member since Jan 2017
70 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:05 pm
I couldn't find a copy online so you have to download the rulebook from the NCAA WEBSITE. I copied the text from the whole page and quoted the exception regarding targeting above it.

quote:

If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference
has the option to consult the national coordinator of
football officials who would then facilitate a video review.
Based on the review, if and only if the national coordinator
concludes that the player should not have been disqualified,
the conference may vacate the suspension. If the national
coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension
for the next game will remain.


FR-88 RULE 9 / CONDUCT OF PLAYERSAND OTHERS SUBJECT TO RULES
• A ball carrier who has obviously given himself up and is sliding feet-
first.
PENALTY—[ARTICLE 3 and ARTICLE 4]—15 yards. For dead-ball
fouls, 15 yards from the succeeding spot. Automatic first
down for fouls by Team B if not in conflict with other rules.
For fouls in the first half: Disqualification for the remainder
of the game. (Rule 2-27-12) For fouls in the second half:
Disqualification for the remainder of the game and the first
half of the next game. If the foul occurs in the second half of
the last game of the season, players with remaining eligibility
shall serve the suspension during the postseason or the first
game of the following season. The disqualification must be
reviewed by Instant Replay (Rule 12-3-5). [S38, S24 and
S47]
When the Instant Replay Official reverses the
disqualification:
If the targeting foul is not in conjunction with another
personal foul by the same player, the 15-yard penalty for
targeting is not enforced. If the player commits another
personal foul in conjunction with the targeting foul, the
15-yard penalty for that personal foul is enforced according to
rule. (A. R. 9-1-4-VII-VIII)
For games in which Instant Replay is not used:
If a player is disqualified in the first half, at the option of
the conference or by pre-game mutual agreement of the teams
in inter-conference games, during the intermission between
halves the Referee will be provided a video of the play in
question for his review in the officials’ private secure location.
The Referee will review the video to determine whether the
disqualification is reversed. The decision of the Referee is
final. (A. R. 9-1-4-IX)
Note: The video source and the location of the review will
be determined prior to the game through mutual agreement of
the teams and the Referee.
If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference
has the option to consult the national coordinator of
football officials who would then facilitate a video review.
Based on the review, if and only if the national coordinator
concludes that the player should not have been disqualified,
the conference may vacate the suspension. If the national
coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension
for the next game will remain.
Clipping
ARTICLE 5. There shall be no clipping (Rule 2-5).
Exceptions:
1. Offensive players who are on the line of scrimmage at the snap within
the blocking zone (Rule 2-3-6) legally may clip in the blocking zone,
subject to the following restrictions:.
Posted by Vitus
Member since Jan 2015
271 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference
has the option to consult the national coordinator of
football officials who would then facilitate a video review.
Based on the review, if and only if the national coordinator
concludes that the player should not have been disqualified,
the conference may vacate the suspension. If the national
coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension
for the next game will remain.


So there's our problem. If the SEC wants to consult someone else, they can - and then it's still up to the SEC to say they were wrong.

I absolutely believe this was a horrible call and it should be overturned - but I have zero faith in the SEC to change it.
Posted by Gulffisherman
Bogalusa
Member since Oct 2009
3531 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

For games in which Instant Replay is not used:


You left out the key element quoted••••

Going to national coordinator only applies to games without instant replay. Instant replay ref immediately agreed with the call.

It was a bullshite call both on the field and on replay review

Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41755 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:15 pm to
The conference already brought in an expert, and Saban says guilty!
Posted by Geauxtigersfootball
Member since Jan 2017
70 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:16 pm to
Call the SEC office nonstop until they bring it to a review.
Posted by Hog cracklin
Member since Aug 2018
321 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:17 pm to
You guys don’t get it! Even if it goes to the National Refs Bama has placed Rogers Redding as the top guy. This deal is done
Posted by Geauxtigersfootball
Member since Jan 2017
70 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:23 pm to
It says if instant replay is not used and the foul happens in 1st half the refs decision at halftime is final...
Then there is note saying if foul is in 2nd half that it can be brought to a review
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45861 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:26 pm to
That’s good work bro!
Posted by Meauxjeaux
102836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
45861 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:28 pm to
Next key issue, who is the national review guy and what are his ties to Bama?
Posted by Hog cracklin
Member since Aug 2018
321 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:34 pm to
Rogers Redding, and when he had to be “reassigned” or “retired” or whatever it had gotten pretty obviously bad. Then he handed off the Bama baton to ole bug eyes, who also got sloppy and was reassigned to the replay booth.
Posted by Gulffisherman
Bogalusa
Member since Oct 2009
3531 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

For games in which Instant Replay is not used:


The above starts a new paragraph in the rule book. This was discussed at length last night.

quote:

quote: Again if i read it right it did not specified games with no replay.

Find the rule and go up 3 paragraphs. The entire section is for games without replay.


LINK to thread last night
Posted by Hog cracklin
Member since Aug 2018
321 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:39 pm to
The guy in the replay booth for the PP7 actually wrote a book about Bear Bryant. This is nothing new, just different players
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41491 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:44 pm to
The team has 2 weeks to sit on this crap. Let it fester. This better than chalkboard material. We comin' out like a buzzsaw for the pink tide.
GEAUX Tigers!
Posted by Geauxtigersfootball
Member since Jan 2017
70 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:49 pm to
No there is a section regarding targeting with two rules. 1 is with replay. 1 is without. Then there are 2 notes.
1st note
quote:

The video source and the location of the review will 
be determined prior to the game through mutual agreement of 
the teams and the Referee. 
which applies to games with or without instant replay.

2nd note
quote:

If a player is disqualified in the second half, the conference 
has the option to consult the national coordinator of 
football officials who would then facilitate a video review. 
Based on the review, if and only if the national coordinator 
concludes that the player should not have been disqualified, 
the conference may vacate the suspension. If the national 
coordinator supports the disqualification, the suspension 
for the next game will remain.


So why would one note apply to games with and without instant replay but the other one is only for games with instant replay?
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60687 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 6:52 pm to
Your rule applies to NCAA games where review is not available. Which would not apply to our game. Won’t surprise me if you get a million upvotes
Posted by Geauxtigersfootball
Member since Jan 2017
70 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:08 pm to
Man do you have anything better to do than troll literally every D. White thread?

Look at the comment above yours...
Posted by Gulffisherman
Bogalusa
Member since Oct 2009
3531 posts
Posted on 10/21/18 at 7:08 pm to
Thanks Tigerfoot.....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram