- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 10/9/18 at 3:13 pm to Chinese Bandit
Posted on 10/9/18 at 3:13 pm to Chinese Bandit
quote:
I am not going to do the work as I am too lazy....but I wonder how the electoral votes would have worked out if every Representative district gave 1 electoral vote for the winner of the popular vote in that district and the overall winner of popular for the state got the extra 2 electoral votes for the senators. There are surely a lot of districts in CA and NY that would have gone R and I am sure there are a lot of districts in TX that would have gone D. Perhaps someone already did this math but it would be an interesting view.
this is actually how it should be done. You shouldn't get all the votes from new york or from cali because of 1-2 cities. Every state should be have their EC votes broken down into that many districts minus 2 or 3 like you said. Winner of each district gets that ec vote and the winner of the state gets a 2 or 3 point bonus (winner by EC votes)
1
Posted on 10/9/18 at 3:15 pm to lsu777
A couple of states do something close to that.
Nebraska and Vermont maybe? I'd have to look it up.
ETA: Maine and Nebraska.
Nebraska and Vermont maybe? I'd have to look it up.
ETA: Maine and Nebraska.
This post was edited on 10/9/18 at 3:18 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News