Started By
Message

re: Swetnick "I would not take one of those glasses from Bart Kavanaugh"

Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14269 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

We need to see a list of people who don't understand what evidence and proof and corroboration mean

I have never said I believe Swetnick's story of multiple gang bangs.

I see you are all twisted up about the lack of due process for Kavanaugh. If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101854 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.




Do you think the Senate doesn't have subpoena power over him if they wanted him to do so?

You have the concept backwards either way, you realize?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73520 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57455 posts
Posted on 10/2/18 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

If there was due process, the third person allegedly in the room at the time of the attack would have been called as a witness instead of sending his canned statement in a letter.
As soon as Blowsy can identify the room and successfully name a witness that was there... you’ll have a point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram