- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Veto? AP for Bell
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:38 am to Mr. Wayne
Posted on 9/13/18 at 9:38 am to Mr. Wayne
I think the "only veto if there's collusion" is an overrated line of thinking. Some trades are just not good for the league.
With that being said, what if he thinks Bell isn't coming back until week 10? Offer him a better deal for Bell.
With that being said, what if he thinks Bell isn't coming back until week 10? Offer him a better deal for Bell.
1
Posted on 9/13/18 at 12:12 pm to castorinho
quote:
I think the "only veto if there's collusion" is an overrated line of thinking. Some trades are just not good for the league.
Vetoing a trade because it makes one of the teams better than everyone else is pathetic.
ETA: This happening right before the deadline and involving a team with no shot at the playoffs is one thing. Happening before week 2 is another.
This post was edited on 9/13/18 at 12:23 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News